Effect of pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Leads to a Larger Intraabdominal Volume During Laparoscopy
Published on: June 25, 2013
Cui Wen1, Yi Qi1, Yingying Xiang1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Background:
Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) are commonly used in laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) has been increasingly used recently. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal ventilation mode. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the effects of different ventilation modes for laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position.
Methods:
Multiple databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published before December 2024 to compare the effects of PCV, PCV-VG, and VCV in patients in the Trendelenburg position who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcomes included peak airway pressure (Ppeak), plateau airway pressure (Pplat), dynamic compliance (Cdyn), and blood gas analysis.
Results:
Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. PCV [Ppeak, 15‒40-min post-pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position (T2): mean difference (MD) - 4.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 5.91 to - 2.64, P < 0.01; 60-min post-pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position (T3): MD - 4.51, 95% CI - 5.41 to - 3.6, P < 0.01; 120-min post-pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position (T4): MD - 5.63, 95% CI - 7.35 to - 3.91, P < 0.01; Cydn, T2: MD 3.15, 1.53 to 4.77, P = 0.0001; T3: MD 2.78, 95% CI 1.43 to 4.14, P < 0.01] and PCV-VG (Ppeak, T2: MD - 3.99, 95% CI - 7.2 to - 0.78, P = 0.01; T3: MD - 3.46, 95% CI - 6.5 to - 0.42, P = 0.03; Cydn, T3: MD 4.44, 95% CI 2.23 to 6.66, P < 0.01; T4: MD 3.61, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.91, P = 0.002) significantly reduced Ppeak and improved Cydn compared with VCV after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position. PaO2, pH, and PaO2/FiO2 did not differ between PCV and VCV or between PCV-VG and VCV during intraoperative surgery.
Conclusions:
Our meta-analysis suggests that in laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, PCV or PCV-VG can provide a lower Ppeak and higher Cdyn throughout surgery but cannot offer better oxygenation than VCV. PCV or PCV-VG might be optimal for laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position.
More Related Videos
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
03:33Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...