Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Standardized Hemorrhagic Shock Induction Guided by Cerebral Oximetry and Extended Hemodynamic Monitoring in Pigs
Published on: May 21, 2019
Determining the Optimal Cutoff Value for the Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale for the
Sol Ji Choi1, Min Joung Kim2, Ha Yan Kim3
1Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Insights
The reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) reliably predicts mortality in pediatric trauma patients. Optimized age-specific rSIG cutoffs improve prehospital triage accuracy for children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Care
- Clinical Triage Tools
Background:
- Pediatric trauma triage accuracy is suboptimal due to a lack of specific tools.
- Improving prehospital assessment is crucial for pediatric trauma patients.
- Existing tools do not adequately address the unique physiology of children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive validity of the reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) for in-hospital mortality in pediatric trauma.
- To determine age-specific rSIG cutoff values for optimizing prehospital triage in pediatric trauma.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter retrospective observational study using the Korean Emergency Department-Based Injury In-Depth Surveillance registry (2011-2022).
- Inclusion of trauma patients aged 18 years and younger.
- Calculation of rSIG from initial vital signs and Glasgow Coma Scale scores; analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves and Akaike information criterion for cutoff determination.
Main Results:
- The study analyzed 333,995 pediatric trauma patients with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0.07%.
- rSIG demonstrated strong predictive performance for mortality (AUC = 0.920).
- Optimized age-specific cutoff values (0-9 years: 13.3; 10-14 years: 18.4; 15-18 years: 20.9) balanced triage goals, achieving 9.17% under-triage and 30.94% over-triage.
Conclusions:
- The rSIG is a validated and reliable predictor of in-hospital mortality in pediatric trauma.
- Age-specific rSIG cutoff values, optimized for triage goals, enhance predictive accuracy.
- Further research is needed for standardized methods to derive triage-appropriate cutoff values for pediatric trauma.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Despite the growing burden caused by pediatric trauma, the accuracy of prehospital triage remains suboptimal due to the lack of reliable pediatric-specific tools. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the predictive validity of the reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) for in-hospital mortality in pediatric trauma patients and to determine appropriate age-specific rSIG cutoff values for triage use. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study using data from the Korean Emergency Department-Based Injury In-Depth Surveillance registry; these data covered trauma patients aged ≤18 years, spanning the period from 2011 to 2022. The rSIG was calculated using the initial vital signs and Glasgow Coma Scale scores upon arrival at the emergency department. Age groups with shared rSIG cutoffs were identified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Akaike information criterion. Cutoff values were derived using the Youden index or further optimized to align with triage goals (<5% under-triage, <35% over-triage). Results: Among 333,995 pediatric trauma patients, the in-hospital mortality rate was 0.07%. The rSIG cutoff values derived using the Youden index showed strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.920 (95% CI: 0.897-0.943). The cutoff values adjusted to meet triage goals-13.3 for those aged 0-9 years, 18.4 for 10-14 years, and 20.9 for 15-18 years-achieved the best balance, with 30.94% over-triage and 9.17% under-triage. Conclusions: The rSIG is a reliable predictor of in-hospital mortality in pediatric trauma cases. We recommend using cutoff values that are optimized to meet triage goals. Further research is warranted to develop standardized methods to derive triage-appropriate cutoff values.
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

