Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

11:38
GENPLAT: an Automated Platform for Biomass Enzyme Discovery and Cocktail Optimization
Published on: October 24, 2011
15.4K
ChatGPT Answers the 110-Question Laboratory Enzymology Student Exam: Pass or Fail?
Berina Hasanefendic1,2, Aleksandra Pasic1,2, Selvedina Duskan1,2
1Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, BIH.
Cureus
|May 14, 2025
Summary
This study evaluated ChatGPT's knowledge in laboratory enzymology, finding it scored lower than students. While ChatGPT-4.0 performed better than ChatGPT-3.5, neither matched human student performance, indicating potential but not replacement for education.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Medical Education
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Recent advancements in AI, particularly chatbots like ChatGPT, have spurred interest in their application across various fields.
- Concerns regarding the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated responses necessitate rigorous evaluation, especially in specialized scientific domains.
- Laboratory enzymology presents a complex area where AI knowledge assessment is crucial for educational integration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the knowledge of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 in laboratory enzymology.
- To compare the performance of these AI models against human students in the same subject.
- To explore the potential utility of ChatGPT in higher and medical education for enzymology.
Main Methods:
- An examination comprising 110 questions across four key topics in laboratory enzymology was administered.
- The accuracy of responses was evaluated for 52 students and both ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0.
- A comparative analysis was conducted between student and AI performance, with a 60% overall pass rate observed.
Main Results:
- Students achieved an average score of 85.46%, significantly outperforming ChatGPT-3.5 (52.73%) and ChatGPT-4.0 (74.55%).
- ChatGPT-4.0 demonstrated superior performance compared to ChatGPT-3.5.
- Both AI versions excelled in questions related to enzymes in metabolism but struggled with laboratory analysis of enzymes.
Conclusions:
- ChatGPT demonstrated average performance in laboratory enzymology, scoring below human students.
- AI chatbots show potential as supplementary learning tools in higher and medical education, contingent upon significant optimization.
- Current AI capabilities in this specialized field do not yet permit the replacement of human educators or comprehensive learning resources.

