Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Implanting Cardiac Electronic Devices with Uninterrupted Antithrombotic Therapy: A Novel Approach to Reduce Pocket
Avishag Laish-Farkash1, Ella Yahud1, Michael Rahkovich1
1Department of Cardiology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Background:
Uninterrupted antithrombotic treatment (ATT) during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation increases bleeding and device-related infections (DRI) risk. The wide-awake-local-anesthesia-no-tourniquet (WALANT) technique, using large-volume local anesthesia and adrenaline, is successful in hand surgeries but its potential to mitigate bleeding risk in CIED implantations remains unknown.
Objectives:
To investigate whether WALANT protocol for CIED implantations reduces clinically significant pocket hematoma in patients with a high bleeding risk or is a contraindication for interrupting ATT.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with CIED surgery patients on uninterrupted ATT. They received WALANT protocol (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline 1:100,000) or standard protocol (lidocaine 1%). Following implantation, patients were blindly monitored in the ward and pacemaker clinic. Patients were monitored for bleeding outcomes post-implantation.
Results:
Forty-six consecutive patients (73.6 ± 9 years, 72% male) were enrolled. In the WALANT group (n=24) no intra-pocket pro-hemostatic agents were needed, compared to 45% in the control group (P = 0.0002). Postoperative pressure dressings were used in 12.5% vs. 68% (P = 0.0002). WALANT patients had smaller hematoma areas (median 3.7 cm2 IQR [1-39] vs. 46 cm2 [IQR 24-76], P = 0.0004) 1-day postoperative. ATT interruption occurred in 12.5% vs. 18% (P = 0.7). Superficial skin infection rates were 4% vs. 9% (P = 0.6). No DRI occurred. No WALANT-related side effects were observed.
Conclusions:
WALANT protocol in CIED implantation with uninterrupted ATT reduced pro-hemostatic agents, pressure-dressing need, and hematoma size. Larger studies are needed to assess its impact on infection rates.
