Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Combining clustering and ensemble learning for groundwater quality monitoring: a data-driven framework for
Harjot Kaur1, Babankumar S Bansod2, Parth Khungar1
1Department of Material Science and Applications, CSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organization, Chandigarh, 160030, India.
Abstract:
This groundwater quality assessment study for the state of Punjab, India, utilized six Water Quality Index (WQI) models, i.e., NSF-AM, NSF-GM, CCME, Horton, West Java, and GPI for potability assessment via machine learning (ML) classifiers. The results of the study manifested poor groundwater quality in many regions of the state that fall below potability standards (WHO and BIS). CCME WQI classified the state's groundwater as poor to marginal, rendering it unsuitable for human consumption. The disparities observed among WQI models highlighted differences in parameter selection, weight assignment, and aggregation techniques, emphasizing the need for a customized WQI framework for the Indian subcontinent for more accurate and robust groundwater quality assessment. K-means clustering, employed as a preprocessing step for improving classification accuracy, grouped data into two distinct clusters (validated by silhouette scores = 0.927 and Calinski-Harabasz index = 129.21), revealing contamination sources' patterns, feature refinement, and enhancement. Further, application and performance analysis of ML classifiers integrated with K-means clustering analysis identified Ensemble Hard Voting (EHV) and Ensemble Soft Voting (ESV) as top performers for groundwater quality classification. The GPI WQI combined with ESV achieved Accuracy = 99.13%, Precision = 100%, Recall = 99.03%, F1-score = 99.51%, Specificity = 100%, MCC = 0.95, Log Loss = 0.11, and AUC = 100% while maintaining moderate model and computational complexity (tpredict = 0.0095 s), underscores the efficiency and suitability of GPI and ESV blend for real-time water quality monitoring systems. The presented data-driven holistic framework highlights the capability of ML-driven groundwater assessment as a decision-support tool for resource-constrained regions, facilitating policy interventions and promoting sustainable water management practices by leveraging its accurate classification and real-time assessment capabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Precipitation Gravimetry
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Gravimetry: Overview
In precipitation gravimetry, the analyte is converted into a precipitate and weighed. For example, the silver content in a sample can be estimated by precipitating and...

