Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

A New Murine Model of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Published on: July 7, 2013
Two-Decade Single-Center Experience with Graft Infections After Infrarenal Endovascular Aortic Repair
Iikka Järvinen1, Ivika Heinola1, Ilkka Kantonen1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Background:
To study the incidence of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) graft infections and to examine the results of treatment at a single institution, where the mainstay of treatment has for 20 years been to explant the infected grafts and to reconstruct in situ with biological materials.
Methods:
All standard EVAR patients treated from January 2000 to December 2022 at our institution were extracted from a prospective vascular surgery database, and post-EVAR infections were identified through a chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Primary endpoints were short-term (30-day and 90-day) mortality and mid-term survival. Secondary endpoints were freedom from reinfections and freedom from reinterventions.
Results:
A total of 29 EVAR grafts in 1,274 patients became infected during a mean total follow-up of 6.36 years (range 4.4 months-23.3 years). The cumulative rate of infections was 1.7%, and the incidence rate was 2.69 cases per 1,000 patient-years in the patient group where the primary EVAR was performed in an elective setting. The median time to infection was 8.4 months (range: 9 days-11.4 years). With 3 additional patients from other institutions, a total of 32 patients underwent treatment for an EVAR graft infection. Only 2 patients (6.3%) were female. Nine patients (28.1%) were treated conservatively, 1 patient was operated with a graft preservation strategy and the rest (n = 22, 69%) underwent graft explantation and in situ reconstruction. In these 22 reconstructions, the graft material used was an autologous femoral vein in 19 (86.4%) patients, a cryopreserved allogenous femoral vein in 2 (9.1%) patients, and a rifampicin-soaked dacron prosthesis in 1 (4.5%) patient. The early postoperative mortality was 19.0% (n = 4 of 21) at 30 days and 23.8% (n = 5 of 21) at 90 days for the patients with explanted grafts with in-situ reconstruction, while survival at 1 year was 76.2% (n = 16 of 21) for the group treated with biological reconstruction and 44.4% (n = 4 of 9) for the conservatively treated patients. Similarly, in Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 3-year survival was 68.2% and 22.2%, respectively (P = 0.002). During a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range: 3 days-12.4 years), there were no reinfections among patients with biological reconstructions, and none of the patients required late graft reinterventions.
Conclusion:
EVAR graft explantation and in situ biological aortic reconstruction offers a viable, infection-resistant and durable solution for the treatment of EVAR infection.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction

