Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Expert Recommendations for Neurodevelopmental Screening in Children with Craniosynostosis: A Consensus Report from
Naman Baraya1, Lia Thibodaux2, Arianna Martin3
1School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
None:
ObjectiveThis study aims to address the gap in standardized neurodevelopmental screening for children with craniosynostosis following surgical intervention. It proposes a structured timeline for assessments to identify developmental delays and cognitive deficits, facilitating early intervention and improved outcomes.DesignTwo neurodevelopmental expert consensus meetings were held virtually with pediatric neuropsychologists and psychologists to review existing literature and identify screening tools, timelines, and implementation strategies. The proposed protocol was then presented to multidisciplinary members of the SynRG research group, including surgeons and craniofacial specialists, to refine recommendations.SettingThe protocol is intended for implementation in multidisciplinary craniosynostosis clinics at tertiary care institutions across the United States.Patients, ParticipantsThe study involved pediatric neuropsychologists and psychologists with expertise in neurodevelopment, as well as neurosurgeons and craniofacial specialists of the SynRG research group.InterventionsThe proposed screening schedule spans infancy through adolescence, incorporating tools such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, NIH Toolbox, and PROMIS measures. Screening intervals align with developmental milestones and academic transitions.Main Outcome MeasuresThe study focused on feasibility, clinical utility, and the ability of the proposal to detect developmental concerns among craniosynostosis patients early.ResultsThe panel recommended a screening protocol tailored to key developmental stages, integrating caregiver input and direct assessments. Feedback from the SynRG group supported the protocol's feasibility but highlighted barriers such as neuropsychologist availability and insurance challenges.ConclusionsThe proposal offers a scalable protocol to neurodevelopmental screening in craniosynostosis care. Implementation in clinical practice could enhance early identification and intervention, improving long-term outcomes.

