Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

44.2K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
44.2K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

173
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
173
Echo01:06

Echo

479
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
479

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and Validation of Modified Basic English Lexicon Sentences for Use With a Pediatric Population.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Electrode Contacts in the Functional Hearing Region for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Sensitivity to interaural phase as a function of frequency: Age effects measured with behavioral and electrophysiological tasks.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Cochlear Implant Recipients With Electrodes in the Acoustic Region: Long-Term Hearing Preservation.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Attrition in Cochlear Implant Research: Sociodemographic, Audiologic, and Performance Variables.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Cross-frequency interactions in band importance functions.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2025

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

546

Estimating Cochlear Implant Users' Sound Localization Abilities With Two Loudspeakers.

Emily Buss1, Margaret E Richter1, Amanda D Sloop1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Trends in Hearing
|May 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Sound source localization ability is crucial for spatial awareness. This study found that virtual sound sources closely mimic real sources, suggesting amplitude panning is a viable clinical tool for assessing spatial hearing in cochlear implant users.

Keywords:
audiologic assessmentbinaural hearingfunctional hearing abilitiessoundfield testingspatial hearing‌

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

316
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

341

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2025

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

546
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

316
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

341

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Speech and Hearing Sciences

Background:

  • Spatial hearing is vital for environmental awareness and communication.
  • Current clinical assessments of spatial hearing, especially for hearing aid and cochlear implant (CI) users, are limited.
  • Assessing sound source localization is challenging in clinical settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare sound source localization using real versus virtually simulated sources.
  • To evaluate the clinical feasibility of amplitude panning for spatial hearing assessment.
  • To investigate the efficacy of virtual sound sources for individuals with hearing loss using CIs or electric-acoustic stimulation.

Main Methods:

  • Compared sound source localization for real and virtual sound sources in 34 adult CI users.
  • Stimuli included 200-ms speech-shaped noise presented at various azimuths (-54° to +54°).
  • Virtual sources were simulated using amplitude panning; real sources used physical speakers.

Main Results:

  • Localization error patterns were similar between real and virtual sources.
  • A strong correlation (r=0.89, p<.001) was found between RMS errors for real and virtual conditions.
  • Virtual sources showed a mean RMS elevation of 3.9°.

Conclusions:

  • Sound source localization with two-speaker amplitude panning shows high similarity to real source localization.
  • Amplitude panning offers a potentially valuable and clinically feasible method for assessing spatial hearing.
  • This technique can aid in evaluating the spatial hearing abilities of CI users when real-source testing is impractical.