Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

07:50
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
15.7K
Scientific Evidence for Clinical Text Summarization Using Large Language Models: Scoping Review.
Lydie Bednarczyk1, Daniel Reichenpfader2,3, Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac1
1Division of Medical Information Sciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
|May 15, 2025
Summary
Large language models show promise for summarizing clinical text, but current research is limited in scope and evaluation rigor. More robust frameworks are needed for trustworthy clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Natural Language Processing
Background:
- Clinicians face information overload from electronic health records.
- Automatic summarization using large language models (LLMs) is a growing area of research.
- A structured overview of LLM-based clinical text summarization is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the state of the art in clinical text summarization using LLMs.
- To evaluate the evidence level of existing research.
- To assess the clinical applicability of current summarization findings.
Main Methods:
- Scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
- Searched 5 databases for literature from January 2019 to June 2024.
- Included studies on transformer-based models for clinical text summarization using free-text data.
Main Results:
- 30 studies analyzed, predominantly retrospective observational designs with real patient data.
- Research focus is narrow, often on radiology reports from intensive care units, primarily in the US.
- Summarization methods are mainly abstractive, with inconsistent reporting and heterogeneous evaluation frameworks; external validation and safety analyses are rare.
Conclusions:
- Significant barriers exist for translating current research into clinical practice.
- The field is exploratory, with limited scope and insufficient evaluation of performance and clinical impact.
- Advancement requires broader scope, robust evaluation, and focus on real-world applicability, safety, and fairness.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

