Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Orthotopic Hind Limb Transplantation in the Mouse
Published on: February 12, 2016
Tooth autotransplantation (part 2): A case series
Quentin Legendre1, Carle Favre de Thierrens2, Sarah Gebeile-Chauty3,4
1Pratique privée, 17 rue Bouquière, 33000 Bordeaux, France
Introduction:
Tooth autotransplantation is an ancient yet little-known technique, despite its high success rate. The aim of this article is to present a series of clinical cases.
Material And Methods:
Patients were treated by the same oral surgeon, either solo or with four-handed dentistry, in collaboration with various orthodontists or dental surgeons in private practice or in hospital settings. Only photographs of cases with more than one year of follow-up are presented.
Results:
The complete series included 12 cases, 7 of which have a follow-up period exceeding one year. The patients were aged between 13 and 34 years. Most of the teeth involved were immature (4 out of 7 cases before Nolla stage 10). The length of follow-up varied, with some cases monitored for up to 3 and a half years. The main indication was replacement of a decayed tooth with a third molar. Three cases involved different situations: impossibility to perform traction as a first-line treatment (due to a severely dystopic tooth) or as a second-line option (due to ankylosis and resorption). One tooth was lost due to excessive milling of the neo-alveolus and active retention. The fallback solution in this case was implant placement. One tooth remained in slight infraocclusion.
Discussion:
Although the routine preservation of third molars should not be standard practice, the wide range of indications (caries, teeth refractory to traction, etc.) calls for a careful assessment of the pros and cons of extracting third molars and consideration of their usefulness, for example for autotransplantation.

