Comparative study of individuals born with orofacial clefts in the United States and Brazil

Adriana M da Silva1, V S Freitas1, A R Vieira2

  • 1Department of Health, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil.

Insights

Children born with orofacial clefts in Brazil face higher risks and adverse birth outcomes compared to the US. Social determinants of health significantly impact cleft susceptibility and infant health conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Gestational complications of orofacial clefts receive limited research attention in Brazil.
  • Orofacial clefts represent a significant public health concern with varying global prevalence and risk factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the burden of orofacial clefts in Brazil.
  • To compare the prevalence, risk factors, and birth health conditions of infants with orofacial clefts between Brazil and the United States.

Main Methods:

  • Population-based, cross-sectional study utilizing national data from Brazil and the US (2017-2021).
  • Inclusion of 13,297 individuals with orofacial clefts in Brazil and 8,853 in the US.
  • Analysis of risk factors (maternal ethnicity, age, infant sex, plurality) and birth health conditions (prenatal care, delivery method, Apgar score, gestational age, birth weight).

Main Results:

  • Prevalence of orofacial clefts was 6.2/10,000 in Brazil and 7.1/10,000 in the US.
  • Brazilian newborns with clefts showed higher rates of cleft palate, prematurity, cesarean delivery, and low birth weight.
  • Mothers in Brazil had higher maternal age, were more likely to be non-white, and had fewer prenatal care appointments compared to US counterparts.

Conclusions:

  • The Brazilian cohort exhibited a greater frequency of risk factors and adverse outcomes related to orofacial clefts.
  • Social determinants of health appear to play a crucial role in cleft susceptibility and poor birth health conditions in Brazil.
  • Further research and targeted interventions are warranted to address disparities in orofacial cleft care and outcomes.