Renal function in pediatric urologic surgical patients: Insight from the National Surgical Quality Improvement...

Renal protection is a frequent indication for urological surgery in pediatric patients; however, preoperative assessment is not routinely performed. We assessed the rates of preoperative renal function testing and stratified outcomes after major pediatric urological surgery. Pediatric urology patients, specifically high-risk patients undergoing genitourinary surgeries, are likely to have an underdiagnosis of renal dysfunction after surgery.

Cases were identified from the 2012 to 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Patients who underwent major urological surgery on an inpatient basis were included in this study. Abnormal renal function was defined as a creatinine (Cr) level of ≥0.5 mg/dL (younger than 2 years) and a glomerular filtration rate of <90 mL/min (2 years or older). Glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the bedside Schwartz equation (2 years or older): estimated glomerular filtration rate = 0.413 × (height/Cr).

A total of 17,315 patients were included, of whom 3792 (21.9%) had documented Cr values. Based on the defined criteria, abnormal renal function was found in 7.3% of infants (younger than 2 years), 6.3% of children (2-9 years), and 15.0% of adolescents (10-18 years). Patients with abnormal preoperative renal function values were significantly (p < 0.001) more likely to experience readmission (10.2% vs. 5.8%), reoperation (3.7% vs. 1.6%), surgical organ/space infection (0.9% vs. 0.4%), transfusion (1.5% vs. 0.6%), renal insufficiency (1.6% vs. 0.4%), or urinary tract infection (5.1% vs. 3.6%).

In this pediatric population, 21.9% of the patients had documented preoperative Cr values before major urological surgery. Patients with documented abnormal preoperative renal function tests experienced higher complication rates. These patients have higher rates of progressive renal insufficiency and acute renal failure than those with normal renal function. The introduction of a standardized and unbiased risk assessment tool has the potential to offer patients benefits by pinpointing individuals with a heightened risk of complications. Further investigation is necessary to enhance the precise categorization of at-risk patients.