Institutional pressures, attention allocation, and corporate ESG performance

  • 0Business School, East China University of Science and Technology, No.130, Meilong Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200237, China.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

External pressures like coercive, normative, and imitative forces significantly boost corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. These pressures increase ESG attention, especially for non-state-owned firms.

Area Of Science

  • Business and Management
  • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Institutional Theory

Background

  • Increasing complexity of the institutional environment necessitates greater focus on corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices.
  • Firms face significant external institutional pressures influencing their ESG strategies and performance.
  • Understanding the drivers of corporate ESG performance is crucial for sustainable development.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To investigate the relationship between coercive, normative, and imitative institutional pressures and the ESG performance of Chinese A-share listed companies.
  • To explore the mediating role of ESG attention and the moderating effect of organizational slack.
  • To examine heterogeneity in the impact of institutional pressures across different types of firms.

Main Methods

  • Quantitative analysis of Chinese A-share listed company data from 2011 to 2021.
  • Regression analysis to assess the impact of institutional pressures on ESG performance.
  • Mediation and moderation analyses to understand the underlying mechanisms and contextual factors.

Main Results

  • Coercive, normative, and imitative institutional pressures significantly enhance corporate ESG performance.
  • Increased ESG attention mediates the positive effect of institutional pressures on ESG performance.
  • Organizational slack positively moderates the relationship between institutional pressures and ESG performance.
  • The impact of multiple institutional pressures is more pronounced for non-state-owned companies, non-heavy polluters, and low-profit firms.

Conclusions

  • External institutional pressures are key drivers of improved corporate ESG performance.
  • Firms can enhance ESG performance by increasing attention to ESG issues, influenced by institutional demands.
  • Organizational slack plays a vital role in facilitating the positive effects of institutional pressures.
  • Targeted strategies considering firm characteristics are essential for maximizing the benefits of institutional pressures for sustainable development.

Related Concept Videos