Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Competitive Transplants to Evaluate Hematopoietic Stem Cell Fitness
Published on: August 31, 2016
Comparison of Regimens Used for Allogeneic Matched Related Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell
Daniel Prior1, Jingchen Liang2, Yanhong Deng2
1Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Prior analyses have reported on the impact of different donor types and conditioning regimen intensities on outcomes for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and demonstrated superior outcomes using an HLA-matched related donor (MRD). However, the impact of conditioning regimen intensity on outcomes remains unclear, with conflicting findings across studies. In addition, the lack of data on comparative outcomes of different approaches to conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for allogeneic HCT for SCD remains a gap in the field. We compared outcomes for SCD patients who have received HLA-matched related donor (MRD) HCT for SCD using different HCT regimens. We examined de-identified records of MRD HCT for SCD on patients transplanted between 1991 and 2022 in the United States and submitted to the CIBMTR. We compared the most common transplant regimens in the registry, which included TBI 300/400 cGy + sirolimus + anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)/alemtuzumab described by Hsieh et al; Busulfan/Fludarabine + CNI/methotrexate (MTX) + ATG/alemtuzumab as described by Krishnamurti et al.; Fludarabine/Melphalan + CNI/MTX + ATG/alemtuzumab as described by King et al.; and Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (CY) + CNI /MTX/prednisone + ATG/alemtuzumab as described by Walters et al. For pediatric MRD HCT, EFS rates were highest with the Krishnamurti et al. (3-year EFS 94%, 95% CI 88, 100) and lowest with the Hsieh et al. regimen (3-year EFS 57%, 95% CI 25, 100, p<0.001). Rates of chronic GVHD were lowest in the Hsieh et al. cohort (3-year rate 0%) and highest in the King et al. cohort (3-year rate 20.4%, 95% CI 13.2, 28.8, p=0.040). For adult MRD HCT, EFS rates were similar between the Hsieh et al. and Krishnamurti et al. regimens, while cGVHD was significantly lower in the Hsieh et al. cohort. These real-world data have the potential to inform shared decision-making in MRD HCT for SCD. Pediatric patients had the highest EFS rates using myeloablative conditioning regimens, while non-myeloablative conditioning resulted in the lowest EFS rates. Adult patients had similar event-free survival using myeloablative and non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, with less GVHD following non-myeloablative regimens.
Prior analyses have reported on the impact of different donor types and conditioning regimen intensities on outcomes for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and demonstrated superior outcomes using an HLA-matched related donor (MRD). However, the impact of conditioning regimen intensity on outcomes remains unclear, with conflicting findings across studies. In addition, the lack of data on comparative outcomes of different approaches to conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for allogeneic HCT for SCD remains a gap in the field. We compared outcomes for SCD patients who have received HLA-matched related donor (MRD) HCT for SCD using different HCT regimens. We examined de-identified records of MRD HCT for SCD on patients transplanted between 1991 and 2022 in the United States and submitted to the CIBMTR. We compared the most common transplant regimens in the registry, which included TBI 300/400 cGy + sirolimus + anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)/alemtuzumab described by Hsieh et al; Busulfan/Fludarabine + CNI/methotrexate (MTX) + ATG/alemtuzumab as described by Krishnamurti et al.; Fludarabine/Melphalan + CNI/MTX + ATG/alemtuzumab as described by King et al.; and Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (CY) + CNI /MTX/prednisone + ATG/alemtuzumab as described by Walters et al. For pediatric MRD HCT, EFS rates were highest with the Krishnamurti et al. (3-year EFS 94%, 95% CI 88, 100) and lowest with the Hsieh et al. regimen (3-year EFS 57%, 95% CI 25, 100, p<0.001). Rates of chronic GVHD were lowest in the Hsieh et al. cohort (3-year rate 0%) and highest in the King et al. cohort (3-year rate 20.4%, 95% CI 13.2, 28.8, p=0.040). For adult MRD HCT, EFS rates were similar between the Hsieh et al. and Krishnamurti et al. regimens, while cGVHD was significantly lower in the Hsieh et al. cohort. These real-world data have the potential to inform shared decision-making in MRD HCT for SCD. Pediatric patients had the highest EFS rates using myeloablative conditioning regimens, while non-myeloablative conditioning resulted in the lowest EFS rates. Adult patients had similar event-free survival using myeloablative and non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, with less GVHD following non-myeloablative regimens.
More Related Videos
05:23Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
Published on: March 14, 2017
11:59Detection of Residual Donor Erythroid Progenitor Cells after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Hemoglobinopathies
Published on: September 6, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Stem Cell Therapy for Tissue Regeneration
Types of Stem Cells used in Stem Cell Therapy
The two main cell types that...
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...