Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025
A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Prevalence of medication administration errors and its determinants among nurses in Ethiopia: a systematic review and
Muluken Amare Wudu1, Ewunetie Mekashaw Bayked2, Yemane Eshetu Bekalu3
1Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, P. O. Box: 1145, Dessie, Ethiopia. 385mule@gmail.com.
Background:
Despite nurses being the backbone of patient care, medication administration errors (MAEs) remain a serious risk to patient safety in low-income countries, including Ethiopia. However, the previous review was outdated, included fewer than 10 studies, focused solely on tertiary hospitals, and did not pool determinants. As a result, this meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of MAEs and their determinants among nurses in Ethiopia, addressing gaps in the study setting, time, and outcomes.
Methods:
The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Observational studies conducted in Ethiopia and published in English from 2010 to 2024 were included. PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were used to search for studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the studies, with three authors participating in the process. Data analysis for the pooled magnitude of MAEs and their determinants was conducted using STATA 17 software with the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed via Cochrane's Q-test and the I² statistic, while publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots, Egger's test, and Doi plot.
Results:
Of the 264 articles retrieved, 18 studies, including 4,314 nurses, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled magnitude of MAEs among nurses in Ethiopia was 57% (95% CI: 49-64%). Moreover, inadequate work experience [OR = 3.64; 95% CI: (3.32, 3.96); I²=0.00%], interruptions [OR = 3.53; 95% CI: (3.19, 3.87); I²=0.00%], lack of guideline availability [OR = 2.14; 95% CI: (1.63, 2.66); I²=0.00%], lack of training [OR = 3.22; 95% CI: (2.67, 3.77); I²=0.00%], night shifts [OR = 3.89; 95% CI: (3.37, 4.41); I²=0.00%], and a nurse-patient ratio ≥ 1:10 [OR = 2.82; 95% CI: (2.19, 3.45); I²=0.00%] were identified as determinants of MAEs among nurses.
Conclusion:
The magnitude of MAEs in the current review was substantially higher compared to global reports and studies in Africa, highlighting the need for urgent intervention. Furthermore, inadequate work experience, interruptions, lack of guideline availability and training, night shifts, and a nurse-patient ratio ≥ 1:10 were identified as determinants of MAEs among nurses. This suggests that providing training, disseminating guidelines in accessible formats, improving staffing ratios, and fostering a culture of safety are crucial steps to reduce MAEs.
Clinical Trial Number:
Not applicable.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:30Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I
01:17Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
01:30Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
01:25Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
01:25Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...