Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

5.3K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
5.3K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

1.0K
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
1.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.2K
Nursing Clinical Information System01:27

Nursing Clinical Information System

1.4K
Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
1.4K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.8K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.8K
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

3.3K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LLM-Based Extraction of Clinical Practice Guidelines into Structured Arguments.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Double-Decoder U-Net for Improved Segmentation of the Overlapping Trapezium Bone in X-ray Images.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Assessing the Concordance Between LLM-Based ICD-10 Coding and a Drug Database for Antihypertensive Drug Contraindications: A Weighted Inter-Rater Agreement Study.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Correction: ABiMed: An intelligent and visual clinical decision support system for medication reviews and polypharmacy management.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2025
Same author

An Intelligent and Visual Clinical Decision Support System for Medication Reconciliation at Admission in a Hospital Setting.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025
Same author

Correction: Adaptive questionnaires for facilitating patient data entry in clinical decision support systems: methods and application to STOPP/ START v2.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2025
Same journal

A GenAI Pipeline for Violinist Kinematic Data Management.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

AMAL-For-Qatar: A Comprehensive AI Ecosystem for Fetal Ultrasound Analysis - Project Overview and Achievements.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Treatment-Aware Multimodal AI for Dermatology: A Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Predicting Postpartum Depression Using Imbalance-Aware Machine Learning.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Validation of Deep-Learning Models for Autosegmentation of Brain Metastases.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Delay-Dependent Gating in Modular RNNs.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K

Argumentation-Based Framework Selection for Clinical Decision Support.

Nada Boudegzdame1,2, Karima Sedki1, Jean-Baptiste Lamy1

  • 1Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, LIMICS, UMR 1142, Inserm, Bobigny, France.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|May 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Argumentation frameworks help structure complex clinical decisions. QuAD and DF-QuAD best suit clinical decision support based on tailored criteria, aiding healthcare professionals in evaluating treatment options and patient preferences.

Keywords:
Argumentation frameworkclinical decision support

More Related Videos

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

4.7K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K
A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

4.7K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Computational Argumentation
  • Decision Support Systems

Background:

  • Clinical decision-making is complex, involving multiple factors like treatment choices, patient values, and differing medical advice.
  • Argumentation frameworks (AFs) offer a structured method for analyzing and reasoning about complex decisions by evaluating supporting and opposing arguments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing argumentation frameworks (AFs).
  • To identify the most suitable AF for clinical decision support.
  • To compare various AFs using criteria specific to clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of argumentation frameworks including Dung's AF, PAF, VAF, WAF, BAF, IBIS, and QuAD.
  • Evaluation based on criteria specifically developed for clinical decision-making needs.

Main Results:

  • The comparative analysis identified specific strengths and weaknesses of each framework in the context of clinical decision support.
  • QuAD and DF-QuAD demonstrated superior performance against the defined clinical criteria.

Conclusions:

  • Argumentation frameworks provide a valuable tool for structuring and reasoning in clinical decision-making.
  • QuAD and DF-QuAD emerge as the most promising frameworks for developing effective clinical decision support systems.