Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Standardizing the Development of Amine-Based Silica Composites as CO2 Adsorbents for Direct Air Capture
Published on: September 29, 2023
A three-step synergy analysis framework for carbon mitigation and pollution reduction in China
1Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Coordinating carbon mitigation (CM) and pollution reduction (PR) significantly improved synergy in most Chinese cities. Efforts should focus on strengthening structural and innovation effects for better climate and environmental quality outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Climate Change Research
- Urban Planning
Background:
- Coordinated governance of carbon emissions and air pollutants is crucial for optimizing the human-land relationship.
- Systematic tracking of synergistic effects between carbon mitigation (CM) and pollution reduction (PR) requires further theoretical and empirical development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a three-step synergy analysis framework to explore the synergy between CM and PR.
- To analyze the synergy between CM and PR in China's 284 prefecture-level cities from 2006 to 2022.
Main Methods:
- Development of a three-step synergy analysis framework: emission synergy, spatial synergy, and response synergy.
- Empirical analysis of CM and PR synergy in 284 Chinese cities over a 17-year period (2006-2022).
Main Results:
- 95.77% of cities showed common reductions in carbon emission intensity and PM2.5 concentration.
- The coupling coordination degree between CM and PR increased from 0.4370 to 0.7384, indicating a shift from a transition to a moderate synergy state.
- Geographical disparities in emission synergy were observed, with central regions lagging behind eastern and western regions; spatial synergy strengthened in the southeast but showed negative relationships in northern cities.
Conclusions:
- Agglomeration, structure, innovation, and policy effects positively influenced synergy, with heterogeneous impacts across different synergy levels.
- Improving CM and PR synergy necessitates strengthening structural and innovation effects, alongside optimizing agglomeration and policy effects.
- Findings offer novel insights for coordinating climate change mitigation and environmental quality improvement.

