Inter-modality variance of blast quantification in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and its impact on

Laurenz Steiner1, Navkirandeep Kaur1, Johann-Christoph Jann1

  • 1Department of Haematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Leukemia Research
|May 17, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Blast count discrepancies across methods impact myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) risk. Molecular data in IPSS-M improved survival prediction, reducing reliance on blast quantification for MDS patients.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Diagnostics

Background:

  • The revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) relies on blast enumeration via bone marrow cytology (BM-c) for myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) risk stratification.
  • The IPSS-Molecular (IPSS-M) incorporates molecular data, potentially offering greater prognostic value.
  • Discrepancies in blast counts among bone marrow cytology (BM-c), flow cytometry (BM-f), and histology (BM-h) may affect patient categorization and overall survival (OS).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of blast count discordance between different enumeration methods on IPSS-R categorization and OS in MDS.
  • To evaluate whether molecular data integration in IPSS-M mitigates the effect of blast count discordance on OS.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 145 MDS cases treated since 2012.
  • Comparison of blast counts obtained by BM-c, BM-f, and BM-h.
  • Assessment of IPSS-R category re-stratification based on discordant blast counts.
  • Survival analysis comparing concordant and discordant cases within IPSS-R and IPSS-M frameworks.

Main Results:

  • Discordance in IPSS-R blast categories was observed in 43% of cases evaluated by at least two methods.
  • Bone marrow cytology (BM-c) based scoring showed re-categorization in 76% of discordant cases when compared to BM-f or BM-h.
  • Discordant lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients had significantly worse OS (72 vs. 35 months, p=0.031) compared to concordant patients based on IPSS-R.
  • This OS difference in discordant LR-MDS patients was not significant when stratified by IPSS-M (p=0.46).

Conclusions:

  • Blast count discordance between enumeration methods is common in MDS and can lead to significant re-stratification.
  • While discordance impacts OS in IPSS-R, the inclusion of molecular data in IPSS-M appears to ameliorate these survival differences.
  • Molecular data holds increasing prognostic importance in MDS, potentially surpassing the impact of blast quantification alone.