Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
Indications and Treatment Outcomes of Below-the-Knee Peripheral Artery Interventions in the XLPAD Registry
Zachary P Rosol1, Sameh Sayfo2, David Fernandez-Vazquez3
1Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, Texas.
Abstract:
There are unresolved questions regarding indications and outcomes of endovascular below-the-knee (BTK) interventions in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) in real-world clinical practice. We analyzed 884 patients from the multicenter XLPAD registry between 2006 and 2023 with nonstent BTK PAD interventions. Primary outcome: freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) at 1 year, a composite of all-cause death, major amputation, or clinically driven revascularization. Majority (62.8%) of the BTK interventions were performed for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), while remaining (37.2%) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC), performed together with an inflow femoropopliteal artery intervention in 58% or involving complex lesion crossings (11.8%). Nearly, 74% were men, mean age 68.0 ± 10.7 years. Mean Rutherford class was 4.65 in CLTI and 2.71 in IC groups. Moderate to severe calcification was present in 25% of cases. Significantly greater number of lesions were treated in the CLTI group (1.84 ± 1.52 vs 2.08 ± 1.61; p = 0.029). Lesion lengths (CLTI: 129.3 ± 85.1 mm vs IC: 115.5 ± 82.5; p = 0.075) were comparable. Nearly, 92% of lesions were treated with balloon angioplasty. Drug-coated balloon use was higher in IC (5% vs 15%, p <0.001), whereas atherectomy use was high in both groups (CLTI: 45.4% vs IC: 49.9%; p = 0.201). Procedural success was similar (CLTI: 92% vs IC: 88.8%; p = 0.098), however 1-year MALE was significantly higher in CLTI patients (30.5% vs 15.8% vs; p <0.0.001), driven by higher all-cause mortality (5.6% vs 2.1% vs; p = 0.014) and major amputations (14% vs 3.7%; p <0.001). Endovascular treatment for BTK PAD is more often performed in patients with CLTI compared with IC, where it is often combined with an inflow artery intervention or complex lesion crossings. Despite similar procedural success, 1-year MALE is significantly higher in CLTI, driven mainly by over a 2-fold increase in all-cause mortality and major amputations.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care