Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Bronchial Thermoplasty: A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Severe Asthma
Published on: November 4, 2010
Prevention of Cardiovascular and Other Systemic Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Asthma Treated with Biologics
Mohsen Sadatsafavi1, Trung N Tran2, Ghislaine Scelo3,4
1Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Abstract:
Rationale: Although clinical trials have documented the oral corticosteroid (OCS)-sparing effect of biologics in patients with severe asthma, little is known about whether this translates to a reduction of new-onset OCS-related adverse outcomes. Objective: To compare the risk of developing new-onset OCS-related adverse outcomes between biologic initiators and noninitiators. Methods: This was a longitudinal cohort study using pooled data from the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR; 16 countries) and the Optimum Patient Care Research database (OPCRD; United Kingdom). For biologic initiators, the index date was the date of biologic initiation. For noninitiators, it was the date of enrollment (for ISAR) or a random medical appointment date (for OPCRD). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to improve comparability between groups, and weighted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of developing OCS-related adverse outcomes for up to 5 years from the index date. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 42,908 patients were included. Overall, 27.3% and 4.7% of biologic initiators and noninitiators were long-term OCS users (daily intake ⩾90 consecutive days in year before the index date), with a mean prednisolone-equivalent daily dose of 10.2 mg and 6.2 mg, respectively. Compared with noninitiators, biologic initiators had decreased rate of developing any OCS-related adverse outcome (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.82 [0.72-0.93]; P = 0.002), primarily driven by reduced rate of developing diabetes (0.62 [0.45-0.87]; P = 0.006), major cardiovascular events (0.65 [0.44-0.97]; P = 0.034), and anxiety and/or depression (0.68 [0.55-0.85]; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rates of new-onset cataract (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.47-1.25]), sleep apnea (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.78-1.41]), or other OCS-related adverse outcomes assessed (e.g., osteoporosis). The results were consistent across both datasets. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the role for biologics in preventing new-onset OCS-related adverse outcomes in patients with severe asthma.
Insights
Biologics significantly reduce new-onset oral corticosteroid (OCS)-related adverse outcomes in severe asthma patients. This study found fewer instances of diabetes, cardiovascular events, and anxiety/depression in biologic users compared to non-users.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Severe asthma often requires oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, associated with significant adverse outcomes.
- Biologics are known to reduce OCS dependence, but their impact on new OCS-related adverse outcomes is less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of new-onset OCS-related adverse outcomes between patients initiating biologics and those who do not.
- To assess the long-term safety profile of biologic therapy in managing severe asthma.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal cohort study utilizing pooled data from the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) and the Optimum Patient Care Research database (OPCRD).
- Inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting (IPTW) and weighted Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze data from 42,908 patients.
- Outcomes were assessed up to five years post-index date, comparing biologic-initiators to non-initiators.
Main Results:
- Biologic initiators showed a significantly reduced rate of developing any OCS-related adverse outcome (HR: 0.82 [0.72-0.93]).
- Key reductions were observed in new-onset diabetes (HR: 0.62 [0.45-0.87]), major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.65 [0.44-0.97]), and anxiety/depression (HR: 0.68 [0.55-0.85]).
- No significant differences were found for new-onset cataract or sleep apnea.
Conclusions:
- Biologic therapy plays a crucial role in preventing new-onset OCS-related adverse outcomes in patients with severe asthma.
- These findings support the use of biologics as a strategy to mitigate the long-term risks associated with OCS use in this population.
More Related Videos
07:28Dry Powder and Nebulized Aerosol Inhalation of Pharmaceuticals Delivered to Mice Using a Nose-only Exposure System
Published on: April 6, 2017
09:58A Reversible, Non-invasive Method for Airway Resistance Measurements and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sampling in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Antiasthma Drugs: β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists
One class of bronchodilators includes β2-adrenoceptor agonists. These agents target the β2-adrenoceptors located on bronchial smooth muscle cells. By stimulating these receptors, β2-agonists induce...
Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...
Drugs Used in Lower Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Bronchodilators, the first step of respiration enhancement, come in various forms, each with its own mechanism...
Asthma-I: Introduction
Antiasthma Drugs: Leukotriene Modifiers
Leukotriene modifiers work through two distinct mechanisms: