Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
Published on: August 24, 2013
A quantitative comparison of the deleteriousness of missense and nonsense mutations using the structurally resolved
Ting-Yi Su1, Yu Xia1,2
1Graduate Program in Quantitative Life Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Abstract:
The complex genotype-to-phenotype relationships in Mendelian diseases can be elucidated by mutation-induced disturbances to the networks of molecular interactions (interactomes) in human cells. Missense and nonsense mutations cause distinct perturbations within the human protein interactome, leading to functional and phenotypic effects with varying degrees of severity. Here, we structurally resolve the human protein interactome at atomic-level resolutions and perform structural and thermodynamic calculations to assess the biophysical implications of these mutations. We focus on a specific type of missense mutation, known as "quasi-null" mutations, which destabilize proteins and cause similar functional consequences (node removal) to nonsense mutations. We propose a "fold difference" quantification of deleteriousness, which measures the ratio between the fractions of node-removal mutations in datasets of Mendelian disease-causing and non-pathogenic mutations. We estimate the fold differences of node-removal mutations to range from 3 (for quasi-null mutations with folding ΔΔG ≥2 kcal/mol) to 20 (for nonsense mutations). We observe a strong positive correlation between biophysical destabilization and phenotypic deleteriousness, demonstrating that the deleteriousness of quasi-null mutations spans a continuous spectrum, with nonsense mutations at the extreme (highly deleterious) end. Our findings substantiate the disparity in phenotypic severity between missense and nonsense mutations and suggest that mutation-induced protein destabilization is indicative of the phenotypic outcomes of missense mutations. Our analyses of node-removal mutations allow for the potential identification of proteins whose removal or destabilization lead to harmful phenotypes, enabling the development of targeted therapeutic approaches, and enhancing comprehension of the intricate mechanisms governing genotype-to-phenotype relationships in clinically relevant diseases.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Mutations
Protein-protein Interfaces
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein....