Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025
Transoral Robotic Total Thyroidectomy and Bilateral Central Regional Lymph Node Dissection for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Published on: September 15, 2023
Ultrasound and gene-guided microwave ablation vs. surgery for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a prospective
Yunfang Yu1,2,3,4, Yuxin Shen1, Yujie Tan1,4
1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Department of Thyroid Surgery, Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Objective:
This prospective observational cohort real-world study evaluates and compares the efficacy and prognosis of ultrasound (US) and gene-based microwave ablation (MWA) and surgical treatment in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), emphasizing the influence of genetic mutations on low-risk patient selection.
Background:
MWA, a minimally invasive technique, is increasingly recognized in the management of PTC. While traditional criteria for ablation focus on tumor size, number, and location, the impact of genetic mutations on treatment efficacy remains underexplored.
Methods:
A total of 201 patients with low-risk PTC without metastasis were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent US and next-generation sequencing to confirm low-risk status. Patients chose either ablation or surgery and were monitored until November 2024. Efficacy and complications were assessed using thyroid US and contrast-enhanced US.
Results:
The median follow-up of this study is 12 months. There is no significant difference between the ablation group (3.0%) and the surgery group (1.0%) in disease free survival (P = 0.360). However, the surgery group exhibited a significantly higher complication rate, particularly for temporary hypoparathyroidism (P < 0.001). Ablation offers notable advantages, including shorter treatment duration, faster recovery, less intraoperative blood loss, and reduced costs (P < 0.001), while maintaining favorable safety and comparable efficiency.
Conclusions:
For patients with low-risk genetic mutations, ablation provides comparable efficacy and disease free survival to surgery, with significant benefits in safety, recovery, and overall cost. Guided by US and next-generation sequencing, precise patient selection enhances the potential of ablation as a promising, minimally invasive alternative to surgery in the management of low-risk PTC .
