Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications
Published on: January 16, 2018
Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Modeling Equivalent Circulating Density for Improved Drilling Mud Management
Mohammad-Saber Dabiri1, Reza Haji-Hashemi1, Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh1,2
1Department of Petroleum Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 76169-141111, Iran.
This study introduces advanced machine learning models for predicting equivalent circulating density (ECD) in drilling operations. The grasshopper optimization algorithm-support vector regression (GOA-SVR) model demonstrated superior accuracy and robustness in ECD prediction.
Area of Science:
- Petroleum Engineering
- Machine Learning Applications
- Drilling Optimization
Background:
- Accurate management of equivalent circulating density (ECD) is vital for preventing well control issues like lost circulation and formation fracturing.
- Traditional ECD calculation methods using downhole tools or complex models can be inefficient.
- This research focuses on a simplified approach using fewer input variables for enhanced efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate advanced machine learning models for predicting ECD with improved simplicity and efficiency.
- To compare the performance of various machine learning algorithms against existing empirical models.
- To identify the key input variables influencing ECD prediction and assess model operational scope.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dataset of 2367 field measurements from two wells in an Iranian oilfield using water-based fluids.
- Applied seven advanced machine learning algorithms: CFNN, GRNN, WNN, PSO-SVR, FFA-SVR, GOA-SVR, and GMDH for correlation development.
- Employed a data split of 70% for training and 30% for testing, analyzing key variables: SPP, ROP, and MW.
Main Results:
- All applied models demonstrated high accuracy in ECD prediction.
- The GOA-SVR algorithm yielded the most reliable results with minimal average absolute percent relative errors (AAPRE).
- The GMDH model outperformed existing empirical models, especially with three key input variables; surface mud weight was the most influential factor.
Conclusions:
- Advanced machine learning models, particularly GOA-SVR, offer a robust and accurate framework for ECD prediction.
- The developed GMDH model provides a superior empirical alternative for ECD estimation.
- Leverage analysis confirmed the high operational scope of the proposed models, with a small percentage of suspicious or outlier data points.
Related Concept Videos
Typical Model Studies
Modeling and Similitude
Density, Specific Weight, Specific Gravity and Compressibility of Fluid
Specific weight represents the weight per unit volume and is calculated by multiplying...
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Density and Archimedes' Principle
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel

