Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement for evaluating the severity of portal hypertension: A retrospective
Rongkun Luo1, Mingcong Chen2, Huanyuan Lu1
1Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China.
Background And Objectives:
EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement has been proposed as a novel direct manometry to quantify portal hypertension. This study aimed to explore the ability of EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate the severity of portal hypertension.
Methods:
The clinical features of patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease who underwent EUS-PPG measurement at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The correlations between the clinical features of portal hypertension and the EUS-PPG measurements were analyzed, and then receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the ability of the EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate disease severity.
Results:
A total of 197 patients were included in this study. The EUS-PPG measurements varied significantly among patients categorized by gastroesophageal varices, red signs, variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, thrombocytopenia, hypoproteinemia, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, or Child-Pugh grade (P < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 0.919, 0.847, 0.813, and 0.804, respectively (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the optimal EUS-PPG cutoff values for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 11.5 mm Hg (sensitivity = 80.3%, specificity = 89.5%), 12.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 77.8%, specificity = 76.7%), 15.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 83.1%), and 16.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 76.2%, specificity = 70.1%), respectively.
Conclusions:
EUS-PPG measurement seems to be an effective technique for assessing disease severity and risk of variceal bleeding in patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease.
More Related Videos
09:37Invasive Hemodynamic Characterization of the Portal-hypertensive Syndrome in Cirrhotic Rats
Published on: August 1, 2018
06:20Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation SHAPE Using Ultrasound Imaging with a Focus on Identifying Portal Hypertension
Published on: December 5, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):