Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.0K
Reputation-based reciprocity in human-bot and human-human networks.
Ashley Harrell1, Margaret L Traeger2
1Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
PNAS Nexus
|May 19, 2025
Summary
Reputation-based reciprocity (RBR) is less effective at promoting generosity in human-bot hybrid systems. People are less generous when aware of bots, altering social norms around helping.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Reputation-based reciprocity (RBR) incentivizes helping behavior in human networks.
- Hybrid systems integrate humans and artificial intelligence (AI), creating new social dynamics.
- Understanding RBR's efficacy in human-bot interactions is crucial for designing these systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether RBR promotes generosity in human-bot networks compared to human-only networks.
- To examine how the presence of bots influences human prosocial behavior and norm perceptions within RBR systems.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted: one with indirect reciprocity networks and known/unknown bot presence, and another with one-shot dyadic human-bot interactions.
- Behavioral observations and evaluations of generosity were recorded in both network and dyadic settings.
- Participants' willingness to help and their punishment/reward behaviors were analyzed.
Main Results:
- RBR was significantly less effective in fostering generosity in hybrid human-bot systems.
- Participants exhibited reduced generosity when aware of bots in the network, attributed to altered helping norms.
- In dyadic interactions, people were less willing to help bots, even with reputational incentives, and judged those who helped bots more harshly.
Conclusions:
- The presence of bots diminishes the effectiveness of RBR in promoting prosocial behavior.
- Humans do not extend the same norms of helping to bots as they do to other humans.
- Hybrid systems require careful consideration of social norm adaptation to maintain prosociality.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
27.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.3K
Nonconscious Mimicry
4.5K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.5K
Relationship Formation
39.5K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.5K
Stereotype Content Model
13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K
Social Exchange Theory
34.1K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.1K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.3K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.3K

