Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025
Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
Asymmetry in Limb Stiffness, Joint Power, and Joint Work During Landing in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Michael A Teater1, Daniel Schmitt2, Douglas W Powell3
1Kevin Granata Biomechanics Lab, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Background:
Kinetic and kinematic side-to-side limb asymmetries can increase after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Limb stiffness asymmetry has not been previously explored.
Hypothesis:
Athletes with ACLR will exhibit greater asymmetry in limb stiffness, peak eccentric joint power, and eccentric joint work compared with asymptomatic controls during landing.
Study Design:
Case-control study.
Level Of Evidence:
Level 4.
Methods:
Forty athletes with 5.9 ± 1.4 months removed from ACLR and 40 asymptomatic athletes completed 7 stop-jumps (SJs) during a single session. Three-dimensional motion capture and ground-reaction force data were collected during landing. Normalized symmetry index values for limb stiffness, peak eccentric joint power, and eccentric joint work of athletes with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts, athletes with hamstring grafts, and control athletes were compared.
Results:
Athletes with ACLR had greater knee power Athletes with ACLR had greater knee power (BPTB, 29.1 ± 17.6; hamstring, 27.3 ± 14.1; Control, 14.2 ± 10.7; P < 0.01) and knee work (BPTB, 35.2 ± 21.5; hamstring, 32.1 ± 18.4; Control, 14.9 ± 10.1; P < 0.01) asymmetries than control athletes. Athletes with BPTB grafts and hamstring grafts both displayed larger knee power and work asymmetries compared with control athletes (P < 0.01 for each comparison), with no differences between graft types (P = 0.90 and P = 0.80, respectively). No between-group differences were found in limb stiffness (BPTB, 16.2 ± 10.8; hamstring, 13.5 ± 9.83; Control, 13.9 ± 9.33; P = 0.63), ankle power (BPTB, 16.5 ± 11.4; hamstring, 14.4 ± 13.0; Control, 18.3 ± 14.0; P = 0.55), ankle work (BPTB, 20.9 ± 13.0; hamstring, 17.4 ± 14.9; Control, 18.4 ± 12.8; P = 0.69), hip power (BPTB, 17.6 ± 12.8; hamstring, 19.5 ± 11.3; Control, 13.3 ± 9.08; P = 0.09), or hip work (BPTB, 17.2 ± 13.9; hamstring, 24.6 ± 14.1; Control, 16.2 ± 11.7; P = 0.06) asymmetries.
Conclusion:
Athletes with ACLR use asymmetric landing strategies that favor their nonsurgical limb, resulting in greater knee power and knee work asymmetries compared with controls. No between-group asymmetry differences in limb stiffness, ankle power and work, and hip power and work were found.
Clinical Relevance:
After 5.9 ± 1.4 months removed from ACLR surgery, athletes favor their nonsurgical limb at the knee, risking further injury. While limb stiffness asymmetry was not different between groups, the groups appeared to modulate limb stiffness differently between limbs to produce similar asymmetry values.
