Impact of BMI, heart rhythm, and heart rate on photon-counting detector virtual coronary calcium scoring

Judith Becker1, Josua A Decker1, Stefanie Bette1

  • 1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.

Insights

Virtual non-contrast (VNC) series from photon-counting detector CT angiography reliably estimate coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) in most patients. However, underestimation may occur with higher BMI and heart rates, potentially impacting treatment decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is crucial for cardiovascular risk assessment.
  • Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography angiography (CTA) offers advanced imaging capabilities.
  • Virtual non-contrast (VNC) series aim to reduce radiation dose by reconstructing non-contrast images from contrast-enhanced CTA data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of CACS derived from VNC series compared to true non-contrast (TNC) series using PCD-CT.
  • To assess the influence of body mass index (BMI), heart rate, and heart rhythm on the accuracy of VNC-derived CACS.
  • To determine the clinical implications of potential discrepancies in CACS categorization.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 88 patients who underwent cardiac imaging with both TNC and CTA on a PCD-CT scanner.
  • Comparison of Agatston scores and CACS risk categories derived from TNC and VNC images.
  • Statistical analysis to assess differences, correlations, and the impact of BMI and heart rate.

Main Results:

  • VNC-derived CACS showed a median underestimation of 11% compared to TNC (median VNC: 449 vs. TNC: 542, p<0.001).
  • High linear correlation (r²=0.95) was observed, with 80% of cases categorized equivalently.
  • Misclassification potentially affecting treatment decisions occurred in approximately 11% of patients, particularly those with BMI >28 kg/m² and heart rate >69 bpm.

Conclusions:

  • VNC reconstructions from PCD-CT provide reliable CACS estimation for patients with BMI ≤28 kg/m² and heart rate ≤69 bpm.
  • A potential underestimation of CACS risk, especially in patients with elevated BMI and heart rate, must be considered in clinical practice.
  • VNC imaging shows promise for dose reduction in cardiac CT while maintaining diagnostic accuracy for CACS in select patient groups.