Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy
Published on: October 14, 2017
Inverse modeling, analysis and control of twin rotor aerodynamic systems with optimized artificial intelligent
Ahmad Al-Talabi1, Taqwa Oday Fahad2, Aqeel Abdulazeez Mohammed3
1Department of Medical Instrumentation Techniques, College of Engineering and Information Technology, AlShaab University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract:
This paper suggests a novel optimal inverse Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network model for the control of Twin Rotor Aerodynamic Systems (TRAS), such as Multi-Input-Multi-Output (MIMO) systems with high nonlinearity and coupling effects between channels. After analyzing and linearizing the dynamic model, TRAS is decoupled into two Single Input Single Output (SISO) systems, thereby creating vertical (pitch model) and horizontal (yaw model) systems. The relationship between the output angle of each subsystem and the input voltage is modeled using the inverse RBF neural network. The weights, biases, centers and widths of the Gaussian function are unknown parameters of the proposed inverse neural model, and they are obtained using Atom Search Optimization (ASO). A combination of the proportional derivative controller and the proposed inverse neural model fed forward controller is then applied to control the angles of each subsystem with different conditions. The simulation results showed that the proposed controller demonstrates noticeable performance improvements over the Fractional Order PID (FOPID) and Particle Swarm Optimization-PID (PSO-PID) controllers. Compared to FOPID, it achieves an 88.3% faster rise time, a 96.0% faster settling time, and a 93.8% lower overshoot for the Yaw model, along with a 42.8% faster rise time, a 73.9% faster settling time, and an 86.8% lower overshoot for the Pitch model. In comparison to PSO-PID, the Yaw model shows a 36.2% faster rise time, an 86.7% faster settling time, and a 59.7% lower overshoot, while the Pitch model exhibits a 58.4% slower rise time but compensates with a 59.9% faster settling time and a 71.2% lower overshoot. Additionally, integral performance indices are notably reduced for the proposed controller.
Related Concept Videos
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence...
Wind Turbine Machine Models
Induction machines interact through the rotating magnetic field generated by the stator and the rotor. The key parameter is slip, which is the difference between synchronous speed and rotor speed relative to synchronous speed. Slip is...
Controller Configurations
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...
One-Degree-of-Freedom System
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
Turbine-Governor Control

