Comparison of two coagulation techniques for the control of pediatric recurrent anterior epistaxis with allergic

Zhengcai Lou1, Zihan Lou2, Zhengnong Chen2

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wenzhou medical University Affiliated Yiwu Hospital, 699 Jiangdong Road, Yiwu City, 322000, Zhejiang provice, China.

Insights

Radiofrequency coagulation (RFC) is more effective than bipolar electrocautery (BEC) for treating pediatric recurrent anterior epistaxis and allergic rhinitis. RFC resulted in fewer complications, less pain, and reduced epistaxis recurrence.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Pediatric Medicine

Background:

  • Recurrent anterior epistaxis (RAE) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common in children.
  • Treatment options for RAE and AR include bipolar electrocautery (BEC) and radiofrequency coagulation (RFC).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the long-term outcomes, postoperative pain, and complications of BEC versus RFC in pediatric patients with RAE and AR.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective semi-randomized study included 67 children with RAE and AR.
  • Patients were assigned to either BEC or RFC treatment.
  • Outcomes measured included epistaxis recurrence, epistaxis severity scores (ESSs), visual analogue scale (VAS) for AR symptoms and pain, and complications.

Main Results:

  • RFC showed a significantly lower rate of epistaxis recurrence at 4 weeks and 6 months compared to BEC.
  • The RFC group reported lower postoperative pain and less nasal crusting.
  • Fewer complications, such as septal ulceration and perforation, were observed in the RFC group.

Conclusions:

  • Both BEC and RFC are effective treatments for pediatric RAE and AR.
  • RFC demonstrates superior outcomes with lower recurrence rates, reduced pain, and fewer complications compared to BEC.
  • RFC may be the preferred treatment for pediatric patients with RAE and AR.
Abstract