Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
A Two-Stage Covariate-Adjusted Response-Adaptive Enrichment Design
Li Yang1, Guoqing Diao2, William F Rosenberger3
1Translational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract:
In the precision medicine paradigm, it is of interest to identify subgroups that benefit most from the treatment. However, the subgroup often cannot be identified until after a large-scale clinical trial. Clinical trials are often designed under the assumption of no treatment-by-covariate interaction effect and enroll all comers. This makes many patients go through unnecessary treatment and may decrease the efficiency of the trial. We propose a two-stage enrichment design that uses covariate-adjusted response-adaptive (CARA) allocation and a novel interaction pseudo-randomization test to evaluate the interaction effect in the interim analysis for binary and continuous outcomes. A pre-defined alpha level is used as the threshold to decide whether a subgroup will be identified and recruited in the second stage. If a below-threshold interaction effect is found, a regression model will be fit and the stratum with the largest treatment effect will be chosen as the best stratum. The trial will continue to the second stage with patients from the best stratum only. If the -value from the interim analysis is above the threshold, the trial continues with all patients. The primary aim is to test the treatment effect between treatment groups. Different CARA procedures are compared in terms of type I error rates, power, and ethical considerations. The CARA procedure that balances better between efficiency and ethics is used in the proposed two-stage enrichment design.
Insights
This study introduces a two-stage enrichment design for clinical trials to identify patient subgroups benefiting most from treatment. It uses covariate-adjusted response-adaptive (CARA) allocation and an interim analysis to adapt trial recruitment for improved efficiency and patient care.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial design
- Precision medicine
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Identifying patient subgroups that benefit most from treatment is crucial in precision medicine.
- Traditional clinical trials often assume no treatment-by-covariate interactions, leading to inefficient enrollment and unnecessary treatment for some patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel two-stage enrichment design for clinical trials.
- To improve trial efficiency and patient outcomes by identifying and focusing on subgroups with the greatest treatment benefit.
Main Methods:
- Utilizes covariate-adjusted response-adaptive (CARA) allocation for patient enrollment.
- Incorporates a pseudo-randomization test in interim analysis to detect treatment-by-covariate interactions.
- Employs a pre-defined alpha threshold to decide on subgroup recruitment for the second stage.
Main Results:
- The design allows for adaptation based on interim analysis findings, focusing on the best-performing subgroup if a significant interaction is detected.
- Evaluates different CARA procedures based on type I error rates, power, and ethical considerations.
- Selects the CARA procedure that optimally balances trial efficiency and ethical considerations.
Conclusions:
- The proposed two-stage enrichment design enhances precision medicine by enabling early identification of treatment-effect subgroups.
- This adaptive approach optimizes resource allocation and minimizes patient exposure to ineffective treatments.
- The study provides a framework for more efficient and ethical clinical trial conduct.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Group Design
Factorial Design
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Censoring Survival Data

