Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergency Free Flap Reconstruction in Traumatic Extremity Injuries: Clinical Indications and Framework.

Microsurgery·2026
Same author

Superior hypogastric plexus block - Transdiscal approach.

Interventional pain medicine·2026
Same author

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Management and Prevention of Symptomatic Neuroma.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same author

Algorithm for Surgical Management of Symptomatic Hand and Digital Neuromas.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Pilot Study: DermiSphere: A Novel Hydrogel with Collagen Microspheres Dermal Regeneration Template.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Cervical retrolaminar blocks: underutilized or ineffective in treating cervical radicular pain?

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2025

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.2K

Vibrotactile Stimulation in Lower Extremity Amputation Patients Using a Noninvasive Vibration Device: A Pilot Study.

Floris V Raasveld1,2,3, Jenna Daddario1, Wen-Chih Liu2,4

  • 1From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|May 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary

A new vibrotactile sensory feedback device shows promise for lower extremity (LE) amputation patients undergoing targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). The device may reduce phantom limb pain (PLP) and improve gait, enhancing patient satisfaction.

More Related Videos

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

9.4K
A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
09:13

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2025

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.2K
A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

9.4K
A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
09:13

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Prosthetics

Background:

  • Restoring sensory and proprioceptive feedback is a significant challenge for lower extremity (LE) amputation patients despite advances in prosthetics.
  • Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery improves limb control but does not fully address sensory feedback deficits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel vibrotactile sensory feedback device for LE amputation patients with TMR.
  • To assess the device's impact on phantom limb pain (PLP), gait, and overall patient well-being.

Main Methods:

  • Four male LE amputation patients (age 25-68) who underwent primary TMR participated.
  • A vibrotactile device with pressure sensors and a vibrating actuator was used for 31 days during prosthesis use.
  • Assessments included pain, function, mental health, satisfaction, and gait analysis.

Main Results:

  • Three out of four patients reported reduced PLP, improved gait, and higher device satisfaction.
  • One patient experienced decreased anxiety and depression.
  • A highly active young patient showed less improvement, suggesting individual variability.

Conclusions:

  • The vibrotactile feedback device shows potential for improving PLP and gait in TMR LE amputation patients.
  • Patient activity levels and psychological factors may influence device efficacy.
  • Future research should explore personalized interventions and long-term outcomes.