Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Psychological insight into corruption: construction and validation of the Corrupt Intention Scale (CIS)
Carlos Ramón Ponce-Díaz1, Jesús Joel Aiquipa-Tello2, Edgard Fernando Pacheco-Luza1
1Instituto Científico de Investigación, Universidad Andina del Cusco, Urb. Ingeniería Larapa Grande A-7, San Jerónimo, Cusco, Peru.
Background:
Corruption, as a psychosocial problem, impacts institutional stability and interpersonal trust. From a psychological perspective, the study of this phenomenon has focused on analyzing corrupt behavior. However, empirical evidence on the measurement of corrupt behavior remains limited due to its covert nature. An alternative strategy is to assess corrupt intent, as it allows inferring behavioral patterns without resorting to direct observation of these acts.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to construct and validate the Corrupt Intention Scale (CIS), taking the theory of planned behavior as a framework.
Methods:
We conducted a multiple study with a total of 1, 488 Peruvian adults. Multivariate statistical techniques such as exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used.
Results:
We found that the CIS presented evidence of internal structure validity for a 12-item model grouped into three correlated factors. It showed measurement invariance with respect to sex, convergent validity and satisfactory reliability.
Conclusion:
The CIS presents psychometric properties that support its use to measure corrupt intent, and can be used in evaluation, research and prevention contexts. In a global context where corruption remains a critical challenge, reliable and valid measures strengthen the basis for future research and mitigation programs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Confirmation Biases
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Cause and Effect
Fundamental Attribution Error
Self-Discrepancy Theory

