Lung lipids associated with smoking and ECIG use in a cross-sectional study and clinical trial

While electronic cigarettes (ECIG) may have lower toxicant delivery than cigarettes, ECIG-liquids and aerosols still contain toxicants that can potentially disrupt lung lipid homeostasis.

Participants from two studies underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Ninety-eight participants (21-44 years old) were included in a cross-sectional study, with 17 ECIG users, 52 non-smokers, and 29 smokers. In the four-week clinical trial, 30 non-smokers were randomly assigned to use nicotine-free, flavorless ECIG or no use. A panel of 75 quantifiable lipid species and 7 lipid classes were assessed in the BAL using two tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) platforms. Ten cytokines and lipid-laden macrophages (LLM) were analyzed using the V-PLEX Plus Proinflam Combo 10 panel and Oil Red O staining, respectively.

In the cross-sectional study, 43 lipids were associated with smoking status at FDR<0.1, including two between ECIG and non-smokers (PC(14:0/18:1) and PC(18:0/14:0)) in pairwise follow-up analyses (Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.017). Associations between lipid species and cotinine, inflammatory markers, including IL-1β and IL-8, and LLM were also identified, as well as differences in lipid classes between smokers and the other groups. Smokers had higher saturated lipids, including ceramide (CER), sphingomyelin (SM), and diacylglycerol (DAG) than that of non-smokers and ECIG users. No significant associations were identified in the 4-week clinical trial.

Smoking was associated with altered lipid levels, as compared to both non-smokers and ECIG users; the majority were downregulated and ECIG effects tend to be smaller in magnitude than smoking effects, although some were different than those in the smokers group. This is a novel study of healthy individuals examining lipidomic differences between smokers, ECIG users, and non-smokers, indicating potential roles of smoking and ECIG-related lipid alterations in pulmonary disease.

The study was approved by The OSU Institutional Review Board (OSU-2015C0088) in accordance with its ethical standards, the Helsinki declaration, and the Belmont Report, and is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02596685; 2015-11-04).