Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Parental and adolescent perceptions of clinical trial participation: the FUEL randomised controlled trial and
Linda M Lambert1, Felicia Trachtenberg2, Russell Gongwer2
1Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Introduction:
Adolescent and parental perceptions of the Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal Assessment Randomised Controlled Trial (FUEL) and its open-label extension were examined, to identify factors affecting future research participation.
Methods:
A validated survey was administered at two time points to adolescents (12-19 years) and their parents to assess likes/dislikes of study participation, research team, study burden and benefits. A 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree [-2] to strongly agree [ + 2]) was used, and scores were averaged. Regression models explored potential predictors. Open-ended questions queried the most/least appealing aspects of participation and considerations for future research.
Results:
Among 250 FUEL participants at 14 centres, 179 adolescent and 183 parent surveys were completed at T1 (6 months after randomisation). Perceptions of research participation were generally positive: 1.35 ± 0.45 for adolescents; 1.56 ± 0.38 (p < 0.001) for parents. There were no significant differences between females vs. males. Themes from open-ended responses included liking to help others and themselves, liking the study team, and disliking study burden. Adolescents liked the compensation and disliked study-related testing. At T2 (end of open-label extension study), 121 adolescents and 114 parents responded. Perception scores remained high at 1.39 ± 0.51 for adolescents and 1.58 ± 0.37 for parents (p = 0.001). There were no significant gender differences in perceptions between adolescents, but mothers had slightly better perceptions than fathers (p = 0.004).
Conclusions:
Perceptions of research were positive and slightly better for parents. Study teams and compensation were key contributors to positive perceptions. Study burden and testing were viewed less favourably. Future studies should consider families' preferences and potential barriers to participation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Blind Procedures
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....

