Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
Published on: July 8, 2021
Effectiveness of calcium hydroxide compared to hydraulic calcium silicate cements for direct pulp capping in managing
Sascha R Herbst1, Vinay Pitchika1, Chantal S Herbst1
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Background:
Direct pulp capping (DPC) is the least minimal approach for maintaining pulp vitality after pulp exposure. Besides calcium hydroxide (CaOH), hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC) have increasingly been used for DPC.
Objectives:
During the S3 level guideline development for material choice in DPC, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature comparing CaOH and HCSC for DPC on permanent teeth. We aimed (1) to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes and (2) patient-reported outcomes of DPC.
Method:
Three databases from 1 January 1990 to 19 February 2025 (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). Prospective comparative clinical studies comparing CaOH to HCSC for DPC in permanent teeth with healthy or reversibly inflamed pulps were included. Studies on primary teeth or teeth indicative of irreversible pulpitis, teeth with unclear diagnoses or pulp exposure of non-cariogenic origin were excluded. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated using the GRADE approach. Using the effect sizes and standard errors for every study, pairwise meta-analysis was performed comparing CaOH and different subgroups of HCSC. Success was defined as the absence of any clinical symptoms (e.g. pain, swelling) and any radiographical signs of an apical lesion. Patient-reported outcomes were additionally sought after.
Results:
Five randomized-controlled trials including 552 teeth with an overall moderate certainty of evidence were included. HCSC showed a significantly higher probability of success compared to CaOH (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.68, 95% confidence interval [1.7, 4.22], I2 = 0%). The differences between various HCSC materials were minimal. Meta-regression indicated that neither follow-up nor risk of bias significantly influenced treatment outcomes, and the funnel plot did not reveal evidence of publication bias.
Conclusion:
HCSC showed significantly higher probability for clinical and radiographic success than CaOH. This finding comes with moderate certainty. The impact of material choice on postoperative pain remains unclear. Future clinical studies should include patient-reported outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
07:07Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice
Published on: January 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Hydration of Cement
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Pore Size Distribution
Adequate...
Sulfate Attack on Concrete
Sulfates from sources like soil, groundwater, or industrial effluents...
Strength and Heat of Hydration
The heat of hydration for each cement compound is significant; for instance, tricalcium aluminate (C3A) and...
Curing of Concrete