Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space
Published on: February 1, 2016
Machine learning positioning algorithms for long semi-monolithic scintillator PET detectors
Samuel Mungai Kinyanjui1,2, Zhonghua Kuang1,3, Zheng Liu1
1Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
Objective.In this work, machine learning positioning algorithms are developed to improve the spatial resolutions of the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors in both monolithic (y) and depth of interaction (z) directions.Approach.Two long semi-monolithic scintillator detectors consisting of 12 lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) slabs of 0.96 × 56 × 10 mm3and 14 LYSO slabs of 0.81 × 56 × 10 mm3were manufactured. The scintillator arrays were read out by a 4 × 16 silicon photomultiplier array. 27 × 5 (y, z) positions of each detector were irradiated via a collimated22Na pencil beam. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model was used to predict the interaction positions foryandz. The genetic algorithm (GA) or particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize hyperparameters for the XGBoost model. The results of the machine learning positioning algorithms were compared to analytical positioning methods.Main results.The GA and PSO algorithms provided similar results. Compared to the analytical methods, the machine learning positioning methods improved bothyandzspatial resolutions especially at both ends of the detectors. The averageyspatial resolutions using the machine learning positioning methods were 0.92 ± 0.41 mm and 0.94 ± 0.44 mm as compared to those obtained with the squared center of gravity method of 1.38 ± 0.23 mm and 1.39 ± 0.25 mm for the two detectors, respectively. The averagezspatial resolutions obtained with the machine learning positioning methods were 1.67 ± 0.41 mm and 1.68 ± 0.45 mm as compared to those obtained with inverse standard deviation method of 2.09 ± 0.82 mm and 2.14 ± 0.81 mm for the two detectors, respectively.Significance.With the machine learning positioning algorithms, the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors with submillimeter slab thickness evaluated in this work provide less than 1 mmyspatial resolution and less than 2 mmzspatial resolution.
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

