Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Cancer inequalities experienced by people with disability: a systematic review
Yi Yang1, Nina Afshar2, Joanna Butchart1
1Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Disability Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Australia.
Background:
People with disability experience worse cancer outcomes than people without disability. One potential pathway is through low screening participation leading to delayed cancer diagnosis and late disease presentation.
Objective:
To summarise and evaluate evidence quantifying disability-related inequalities in (1) cancer mortality, (2) fatality among cancer patients; and for cervical, breast, colorectal and lung cancers: (3) screening participation and (4) stage at diagnosis.
Methods:
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and Scopus up to November 2023 for studies that quantified disability-related inequalities in the four outcomes. Studies were evaluated using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Exposures tool.
Results:
We found 73 eligible articles globally. People with disability had higher cancer mortality compared to those without. This inequality was most pronounced among people with intellectual disability. Evidence showed substantially higher fatality among cancer patients with disability compared to those without consistently across disability groups and cancer types. Screening uptake for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers was consistently lower for people with various disability types in multiple countries. Evidence regarding inequalities in stage at diagnosis for people with disability was limited and inconsistent. The main methodological challenges for future research are: complexity in defining disability, underestimation of inequalities due to over-adjustment of mediating factors, under-representation of people with severe disability in data, and reporting inequalities on relative scales only.
Conclusions:
Existing evidence reinforces the need for high-quality cancer inequality research for this population, and a multi-pronged, inclusive approach to prioritise people with disability in the whole cancer control pathway.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Cancer Survival Analysis

