Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Pilot evaluation of the Health Organization and System Trustworthiness scale: reliability and validity testing
Andrew Anderson1, Dakota W Cintron2
1Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. aander86@jh.edu.
Objective:
This study evaluated the reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the Healthcare Organization and System Trustworthiness (HOST) scale, a tool designed to assess perceived trustworthiness in healthcare systems.
Study Design:
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA/CFA) were conducted to examine the scale's structure, while measurement testing assessed its consistency across demographic groups. Agreement with the Medical Mistrust Index (MMI) was evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot, and concurrent validity was explored through associations with seven outcomes, including vaccine hesitancy, uptake, and trust in government.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods:
Data were collected from a national sample of 4,100 U.S. residents aged 18 years and older, with a diverse representation of race/ethnicity (25% Black, 24% Hispanic, 32% White) and LGBTQ identity (13% as cisgendered bisexual, 5% as cisgendered gay/lesbian, and 82% cisgendered straight).
Findings:
The HOST scale demonstrated a unidimensional structure, high internal consistency (α = 0.80), and strong concurrent validity with the MMI (r = 0.52). Scalar invariance was established across gender, LGBTQ status and regular health care access. Weak invariance was observed across racial groups. Compared to the MMI, the HOST scale had stronger correlations with trust in vaccine-related actors (r = 0.71 vs. 0.14) and perceptions of government trustworthiness at the federal (r = -0.38 vs. -0.15), state (r = -0.40 vs. -0.09), and local levels (r = -0.42 vs. -0.11).
Conclusions:
The HOST scale shows promise as a tool for assessing trustworthiness in healthcare systems, particularly in capturing perceptions of fairness, competence, and future expectations. While its strong predictive validity across diverse outcomes underscores its potential utility, further refinement and validation are necessary before broader application. Additional testing is recommended to explore its use in addressing health disparities and informing public health strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Obedience
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Self-Report Tests of Personality

