Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
The role of postoperative radiotherapy for invasive thymic epithelial tumors: a single-center experience
Peng Zhang1, Yongjia Chai2, Peng Zhang2
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Background:
Surgery is the primary treatment modality for thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). However, the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the management of thymoma remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to evaluate the role of PORT in improving clinical outcomes for patients with thymoma.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent surgery for TETs at the Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from October 2001 to July 2021. Patients classified as Masaoka-Koga stage II to IVA were included in the study. The impact of PORT on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Results:
A total of 211 thymoma patients were included in this study, among whom 141 cases (66.8%) underwent PORT. Overall, PORT was not associated with a significant improvement in OS or RFS in the entire cohort. However, in patients with locally advanced disease, PORT for Masaoka-Koga stage III-IVA thymoma was significantly associated with improved OS (P=0.01), although it did not result in a significant improvement in RFS (P=0.12). Subgroup analyses revealed that PORT significantly improved OS (P=0.042) in patients with Masaoka-Koga stage III thymoma. Furthermore, among patients with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III thymoma [according to the Union for the International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM Classification, 8th Edition], the PORT group exhibited significantly better RFS (P=0.03) and OS (P=0.01). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that TNM stage was the only statistically significant factor influencing OS in univariate analysis among patients with aggressive thymoma [TNM stage I-II vs. TNM stage III, hazard ratio (HR): 5.669, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.347-23.852, P=0.02]. In addition, PORT was the only statistically significant factor influencing OS in univariate analysis for patients with TNM stage III thymoma (PORT vs. non-PORT, HR: 13.646, 95% CI: 1.522-122.356, P=0.02).
Conclusions:
PORT plays a significant role in the management of thymoma patients. For patients with Masaoka-Koga stage II thymoma, the potential benefits of PORT require further investigation. In patients with Masaoka-Koga stage III-IVA thymoma, PORT is associated with improved OS but does not appear to prevent disease recurrence. Additionally, among TNM stage III patients, the PORT group demonstrated significantly better RFS and OS. TNM stage is a potentially independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with aggressive thymoma, while PORT represents a critical prognostic factor for survival in patients with TNM stage III thymoma.

