Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Variations in bone mineral density after joint replacement: A systematic review examining different anatomical
Domenico Alesi1,2, Raffaele Zinno3, Maria Scoppolini Massini3
1Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM) University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Purpose:
This study aims to evaluate postoperative periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) at various time points following joint replacement with different implant designs and fixation techniques.
Methods:
Database search was conducted on MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies analyzing bone remodelling after joint replacement (March 2002-January 2024). Inclusion criteria: English-language articles; total joint replacement; at least two BMD evaluations; observational studies, cross-sectional, prospective, retrospective, randomised controlled trials, and clinical trials. Exclusion criteria: no BMD measurement within one month after surgery; BMD data only expressed as percentage changes or graphs without numerical values; no Gruen zone evaluation for hip replacement; no periprosthetic bone evaluation for knee replacement; pharmacological treatment or comorbidities affecting BMD; revision joint replacements; irrelevant articles; no full text or no original data.
Results:
Sixty-eight articles matched the selection criteria. Fifty-five focused on the hip joint, 12 on the knee, and one on the shoulder. After total hip arthroplasty, the greatest bone resorption occurred in the proximal femur, peaking at 6 months. Cemented implants and tapered stems showed greater bone resorption than cementless implants and anatomical stems. BMD around the acetabular component decreased during the first 6 months but increased in regions subjected to higher loads. In total knee arthroplasty, bone loss occurred in the anterior distal femur and medial tibial plateau, with cemented and posterior-stabilised implants showing greater bone loss than cementless and cruciate-retaining designs.
Conclusions:
The periprosthetic BMD decreases progressively after joint replacement. The fixation technique and implant design influence the extent and pattern of this decline. These factors must be considered during the surgical planning, as they can have long-term implications for bone health and implant longevity. Further research is needed to optimise implant design and surgical techniques to mitigate BMD loss and improve patient outcomes.
Level Of Evidence:
Level IV.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
01:40Bone Remodeling
01:18The Bone Matrix
01:31Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
01:31Essential Minerals for Bone Health
Calcium and Phosphorus
Calcium is a critical component of bones, especially in the form of calcium phosphate and calcium carbonate. Since the body cannot make calcium, it must be obtained from the diet. However, calcium cannot be absorbed from the small intestine without...
01:09Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...