Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Does Differential Privacy Prevent Backdoor Attacks in Practice?
Fereshteh Razmi1, Jian Lou2, Li Xiong1
1Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322, USA.
Abstract:
Differential Privacy (DP) was originally developed to protect privacy. However, it has recently been utilized to secure machine learning (ML) models from poisoning attacks, with DP-SGD receiving substantial attention. Nevertheless, a thorough investigation is required to assess the effectiveness of different DP techniques in preventing backdoor attacks in practice. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of DP-SGD and, for the first time, examine PATE and Label-DP in the context of backdoor attacks. We also explore the role of different components of DP algorithms in defending against backdoor attacks and will show that PATE is effective against these attacks due to the bagging structure of the teacher models it employs. Our experiments reveal that hyper-parameters and the number of backdoors in the training dataset impact the success of DP algorithms. We also conclude that while Label-DP algorithms generally offer weaker privacy protection, accurate hyper-parameter tuning can make them more effective than DP methods in defending against backdoor attacks while maintaining model accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
Censoring Survival Data
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

