Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

538
Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
538
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

54
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
54
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

35
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
35
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

55
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
55
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

208
Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
208
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

26
Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
26

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Compact 2D Laser Scattering System for Quantitative Structural Analysis in Colloidal Assemblies.

ACS nano·2025
Same author

Developing Topics.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Developing Topics.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Effect of ART1 on the efficacy of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer under high-cholesterol conditions.

Histology and histopathology·2025
Same author

Excess <sup>40</sup>Ar retention in metamorphosed amphibole complicates <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar geochronological interpretation of diabase.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Cervical Lymphatic Bypass for Alzheimer Disease: Toward Standardized Monitoring in a New Frontier of Supermicrosurgery.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

10.9K

Machine learning models for pharmacogenomic variant effect predictions - recent developments and future frontiers.

Roman Tremmel1,2, Antoine Honore3, Yoomi Park4,5

  • 1Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.

Pharmacogenomics
|May 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models predict the effects of genetic variations on drug response. These tools help overcome challenges in precision medicine by functionally characterizing rare variants.

Keywords:
Variants of unknown significancedeep learningdrug metabolismevolutionary conservationmachine learningprotein functionvariant effect prediction

More Related Videos

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
00:06

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

13.6K
Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

10.9K
In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
00:06

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

13.6K
Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genetic variations significantly influence individual drug responses and toxicity.
  • Millions of rare genetic variants remain functionally uncharacterized, hindering precision medicine.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers advanced methods for predicting variant effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current ML-based variant effect predictors for pharmacogenomics.
  • To discuss methodological differences, strengths, and limitations of these tools.
  • To explore emerging methods for predicting substrate-specificity and epistasis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing DNA and protein sequences, evolutionary conservation, and haplotype structures.
  • Employing deep learning models for evolutionary conservation and biophysical properties.
  • Integrating multiple predictive models through ensemble approaches for enhanced accuracy.

Main Results:

  • ML models significantly improve the prediction of variant effects on drug response.
  • Deep learning and ensemble methods show increased accuracy, robustness, and interpretability.
  • Emerging methodologies address substrate-specificity and variant epistasis.

Conclusions:

  • ML-based tools are crucial for functionally characterizing drug-related genetic variants.
  • These predictors offer a viable strategy to translate genomic data into pharmacogenetic recommendations.
  • Advancements in ML are key to realizing the full potential of precision medicine.