Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Stereo-Electro-Encephalo-Graphy SEEG With Robotic Assistance in the Presurgical Evaluation of Medical Refractory Epilepsy: A Technical Note
Published on: June 13, 2016
Development and feasibility testing of an implementation evaluation tool: Recommendations from the managing epilepsy
Martha Sajatovic1, Ross Shegog2, Elaine Kiriakopoulos3
1Departments of Psychiatry and of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106-1715, USA; Departments of Psychiatry and of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 10524 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Aims:
The Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network has led the development, testing and scale-up of epilepsy self-management (ESM). The MEW Integrated Database (MEW DB) is a pooled repository of archival studies that facilitates aggregate analysis. This report describes an implementation evaluation tool for ESM adopters.
Methods:
Publicly available materials on program implementation, adoption and sustainability as well as readiness surveys used by the MEW Network were reviewed, as were content domains and format styles relevant to ESM implementation. Requirements for data Tiers included: 1) survey Tier should be short (≤6 items) and completed quickly (< 3 min), 2) question and response format should be consistent, 3) data elements are relevant to ESM adopters and 4) the tool should be applicable across ESM programs. Iterative review, discussion and item-ranking yielded a final set of 3 distinct data element Tiers.
Results:
Implementation data elements assess the characteristics of organization that may be a potential ESM adopter (Tier 1), organizational readiness to ESM implementation (Tier 2) and perceptions of ESM program effects or impact by adopters at the individual and program levels (Tier 3). There are 18 data elements, 6 elements in each Tier. Organizational characteristics reflect health disparities among people with epilepsy and common comorbidities. Implementation readiness barriers include motivational factors, training and resources. Implementation experience/outcomes include perceived ESM duration, credibility, impact, likability and effectiveness.
Conclusions:
A brief and practical implementation evaluation tool for ESM has potential value and important clinical and policy implications in advancing care for people with epilepsy.
More Related Videos
08:23A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
10:23Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
Published on: June 23, 2023