Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Injury survivability and death preventability during recent conflicts in French combat fatalities: A retrospective
Johan Schmitt1, Clément Hoffmann, Henri De Lesquen
1From the Intensive Care Unit and Anesthesiology Department (J.S., E.M.), Military Teaching Hospital Sainte Anne, Toulon; Intensive Care Unit (C.H.), and Burn Unit (C.H.), Military Teaching Hospital Percy, Clamart; Surgery Department (H.D.L.D.P.C., T.M., P.B.), Military Teaching Hospital Sainte Anne, Toulon; Combat Traumatology Department (N.P.), IRBA, Bretigny sur Orge; and First Legion Unit (D.C.), Military Legion Corps, Aubagne, France.
Background:
Understanding combat mortality is vital to improving patient outcomes. We investigated injury survivability and death preventability in French combat fatalities.
Methods:
This retrospective study included all French combat fatalities in overseas operations between 2008 and 2023. For each combat fatality, we assessed the survivability of their injuries and the preventability of their death. A case review was conducted to identify opportunities for improvement.
Results:
Among the 123 patients included, 74.7% were classified as killed in action. The case fatality rate decreased from 17.4% to 13.1% ( p = 0.48). The overall population sustained a median of three severe injuries (2.0-4.0), with the head-neck region being the primary involved injury (38.9%). Nonsurvivable injuries comprised 66.7% of the entire cohort; potentially survivable injuries, 30.9% of the cohort; and survivable injuries, 2.4% of the cohort. Nonpreventable death represented 73.9% of the population, and potentially preventable death represented 26.1% of the population, whereas none died from preventable death. Fatalities from Sahelian operations sustained more explosion-related injuries (47.7% vs. 29.9%), resulting in more catastrophic tissue destruction (36.4% vs. 14.9%) without significant differences in death preventability. Median evacuation time was higher for the Sahel died of wounds group (130.0 [35.0-180.0] vs. 65.0 [43.8-111.8] minutes), and half of fatalities with (potentially) survivable injuries did not survive to the "Golden Hour." Among died of wounds group with (potentially) survivable injuries at Role 2, noncompressible torso hemorrhage was the mechanism of death in 57.1% of fatalities and junctional hemorrhage in 14.2% of fatalities. Opportunities for improvement were mainly focused on the prehospital setting (85.7%).
Conclusion:
Most combat fatalities were classified as killed in action and had nonpreventable death, while potentially preventable deaths were mainly caused by noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. Opportunities for improvement findings and real-time mortality reviews should drive training courses and further research to have the greatest impact on survival.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.
More Related Videos
04:02Author Spotlight: Developing Precise and Clinically Relevant Models for Studying Secondary Degeneration in Traumatic Optic Neuropathy
Published on: November 29, 2024
11:28A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups