Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing perinatal mortality.

H A Hein, S S Lathrop, K R Papke

    Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |September 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Comparing perinatal outcomes requires accounting for patient risk. Differences in neonatal and fetal mortality rates between hospitals diminish when analyzed by birth weight, suggesting risk adjustment is crucial for accurate data interpretation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Back to sleep: good advice for parents but not for hospitals?

    Pediatrics·2001
    Same author

    Readmission to the intensive care unit after liver transplantation.

    Critical care medicine·2001
    Same author

    Reflections about a friend.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2000
    Same author

    Regionalization of perinatal health care: a lesson learned but lost.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2000
    Same author

    The changing pattern of neonatal mortality in a regionalized system of perinatal care: A current update.

    Pediatrics·1999
    Same author

    The perioperative management of portopulmonary hypertension with nitric oxide and epoprostenol.

    Anesthesiology·1999

    Area of Science:

    • Perinatal medicine
    • Healthcare outcomes research
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Regional and hospital-level perinatal outcome data comparisons can be misleading without considering population risk status.
    • Two large perinatal centers, one in San Antonio, Texas, and another in Iowa City, Iowa, exhibit notably different institutional neonatal and fetal mortality rates.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of risk status on perinatal outcome data comparisons between different healthcare centers.
    • To demonstrate how birth weight stratification can reveal more accurate comparisons of neonatal and fetal mortality rates.
    • To explain how a regionalized system of care can influence mortality rates at a referral center while maintaining positive regional outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of institutional neonatal and fetal mortality rates from two large perinatal centers.
    • Stratification of mortality data by birth weight groupings for a more granular comparison.
    • Examination of regionalized healthcare system data to contextualize referral center outcomes.

    Main Results:

    • Overall institutional mortality rates differ significantly between the two centers.
    • When analyzed by birth weight, the differences in neonatal and fetal mortality between the two hospitals are substantially reduced.
    • Data from Iowa's regionalized system illustrate how increased mortality at a referral center can coexist with improved regional perinatal outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Risk adjustment, particularly by birth weight, is essential for accurate comparisons of perinatal outcomes between institutions.
    • Apparent disparities in mortality rates may not reflect differences in quality of care but rather variations in patient population risk.
    • Regionalized healthcare systems can optimize overall perinatal outcomes, even if individual referral centers show higher mortality due to population risk.

    Related Experiment Videos