Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Paradigms for Behavioral Assessment in Drosophila Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: September 6, 2024
Let's go WILD: increasing inclusivity in theories of developmental psychology
Kim A Bard1, Heidi Keller2, David A Leavens3
1Sponsored Affiliate, University of Michigan, Dearborn, MI, USA.
Developmental psychology theories are often biased towards Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD) samples. A new Worldwide, In situ, Local, and Diverse (WILD) approach is needed to create more inclusive and representative developmental theories.
Area of Science:
- Developmental psychology
- Cross-cultural psychology
- Theory development
Background:
- Developmental psychology research predominantly uses samples from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD) societies.
- This WEIRD bias extends to developmental theories, limiting their generalizability and applicability across diverse populations.
- There is an urgent need to revise developmental theories to be more inclusive and scientifically robust.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the extent to which prominent developmental theories exhibit WEIRD bias or align with a Worldwide, In situ, Local, and Diverse (WILD) approach.
- To identify inclusivity gaps in foundational developmental theories, specifically Shared Intentionality Theory and Attachment Theory.
- To propose practical steps for increasing inclusivity in developmental psychology research and theory building.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of two prominent developmental theories: Shared Intentionality Theory (bottom-up) and Attachment Theory (top-down).
- Evaluation of theoretical constructs, foundational databases, and claims for cultural diversity and WEIRD bias.
- Application of the Five Steps to Increase Inclusivity framework.
Main Results:
- Shared Intentionality Theory demonstrates WEIRD bias due to a lack of culturally diverse data in its core constructs.
- Attachment Theory exhibits inclusivity issues by overlooking diverse social-emotional constructs (e.g., interdependence, communal orientations) prevalent in non-WEIRD cultures.
- Both theories fail to adequately represent the developmental landscape of all humans.
Conclusions:
- Developmental theories must move beyond WEIRD biases to embrace a Worldwide, In situ, Local, and Diverse (WILD) perspective.
- Acknowledging and addressing theoretical inclusivity is crucial for both scientific advancement and ethical application of psychological knowledge.
- Implementing strategies for increasing inclusivity can help decenter psychological theories from a WEIRD mindset and foster a more representative understanding of human development.
More Related Videos
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
14:38Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Psychosexual Theory of Development
The Five Stages of Psychosexual Development
Freud's psychosexual...
Evolutionary Psychology
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Schemata...
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...