Health-related quality of life with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS study

  • 0Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) improved patient-reported outcomes in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. D-VMP showed greater benefits in global health status and social functioning compared to VMP alone.

Area Of Science

  • Hematology
  • Clinical Oncology
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Research

Background

  • Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in transplant-ineligible Asian patients requires effective treatment strategies.
  • Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial for assessing treatment impact beyond clinical efficacy.
  • The OCTANS trial evaluated daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus VMP in this population.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To evaluate the impact of D-VMP compared to VMP on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM.
  • To assess quality of life and symptom burden using validated questionnaires.

Main Methods

  • Phase 3 OCTANS study randomized 220 patients to D-VMP or VMP.
  • PROs assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires at scheduled intervals.
  • Mixed-effects model for repeated measures used to analyze treatment effects on PROs.

Main Results

  • Comparable PRO improvements from baseline were observed between D-VMP and VMP groups.
  • D-VMP demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Global Health Status (GHS) at 9 months (p=0.0443).
  • Significant improvements in social functioning and nausea/vomiting symptoms were noted with D-VMP at 12 months (p=0.0042 and p=0.0012, respectively).

Conclusions

  • Both D-VMP and VMP improved PROs in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM.
  • D-VMP showed superior improvements in GHS, social functioning, and nausea/vomiting symptoms compared to VMP.
  • These findings support D-VMP as a treatment option that positively impacts quality of life in this patient population.