Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stress incontinence: why and how operations work.

S L Stanton

    Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    |June 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Uncertainty remains regarding the effectiveness of many continence procedures. Standardized, long-term studies are crucial for comparing treatments and understanding outcomes for urinary incontinence (UI).

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Self-assessment of morbidity following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

    Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2004
    Same author

    Pelvic floor dysfunction in women after pelvic trauma.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2004
    Same author

    Symptoms and anal sphincter morphology following primary repair of third-degree tears.

    The British journal of surgery·2003
    Same author

    Urological problems in pregnancy.

    BJU international·2002
    Same author

    Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures.

    International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction·2002
    Same author

    Bowel function and hysterectomy--a review.

    International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Innovation
    • Patient Outcomes

    Background:

    • The precise mechanisms by which continence procedures achieve cure are not fully understood.
    • Current surgical interventions for urinary incontinence can lead to significant side effects, including urge incontinence and voiding difficulties.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the need for standardized methodologies in evaluating continence procedures.
    • To emphasize the importance of matching surgical interventions to the underlying pathophysiology of urinary incontinence.

    Main Methods:

    • The abstract calls for randomized studies with matched patients, considering factors like age, parity, and surgical history.
    • It stresses the necessity of documenting patient entry criteria and presenting both subjective and objective results.
    • A minimum follow-up period of two to five years is recommended.

    Main Results:

    • Current data lacks the standardization required for true comparison of different continence procedures.
    • The potential for unacceptable side effects necessitates careful consideration of treatment outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized, long-term, randomized controlled trials are essential for accurately assessing the efficacy and safety of urinary incontinence procedures.
    • A selective, schematic approach is required to match surgical techniques with the specific anatomical or pathophysiological cause of incontinence.

    Related Experiment Videos