Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Provider confidence and willingness to insert and remove long-acting reversible contraception methods in Kenyan
Katherine Tumlinson1, Stephanie Chung2, Brooke W Bullington3
1Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Objective:
Use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in Kenya has grown over the last decade, yet emerging evidence points to challenges in LARC removal. The objective of this paper is to document provider training in LARC insertion/removal and to better understand provider experience, confidence, and willingness to both insert and remove LARC.
Study Design:
In this paper we present a descriptive analysis of self-reported data from family planning providers working in all 137 public-sector healthcare facilities in Kisumu County (Western Kenya). We assess the frequency of public-sector provider training, experience, confidence, and willingness to insert and remove LARC, as well as the association between confidence and willingness to provide these services.
Results:
A substantial proportion of providers in our study lacked training in the insertion and removal of both implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). Overall, providers reported that they were more experienced, confident, and willing to insert implants rather than remove them. A fifth of providers trained in IUD insertion were not confident in their ability to insert IUDs and nearly 10% were not willing to perform insertion. In contrast, 8% of providers trained in IUD insertion were not confident in their ability to remove IUDs and 6% were not willing to remove them. Provider confidence was significantly associated with willingness to insert/remove both implant and IUD. Less than two-thirds of facilities demonstrated stock of the implant (61%) or IUD (58%).
Conclusion:
Results raise important concerns about reproductive autonomy within the larger environment of family planning programs that heavily promote LARC use. Within Kisumu, public-sector providers require greater supplies and support to maintain confidence and ensure their willingness to engage in LARC insertion and removal in equal measure.
Implications:
We find that many providers at public sector healthcare facilities in Kisumu, Kenya lacked training in LARC insertion and removal. Providers reported that they were more experienced, confident, and willing to insert rather than remove implants, which poses a potential threat to reproductive autonomy.
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning

