Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
Published on: March 24, 2023
Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs
J E Doe1, P Botham2, D Holland3
1School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
None:
EPAA's 'NAM Designathon 2023' challenge for human toxicity sought to identify a classification system capable of categorising chemicals based on their bioactivity and bioavailability properties determined using non-animal methodologies (Worth et al. 2025). The proposal is made to classify chemicals into three levels of concern: low concern could be used without restriction, medium concern requiring assessment to establish safe use levels and high concern being candidates requiring risk management (Berggren and Worth in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 142:105431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431 , 2023). We developed a NAMs based classification system for "human systemic toxicity" mainly focussed on repeat dose toxicity, similar to the assessment carried out in classification for 'Specific Target Organ Toxicity-Repeated Exposure' (STOT-RE) based on ECETOC's Tiered Approach integrating three lines of evidence: In silico predictions, In vitro bioavailability and PBK modelling, In vitro bioactivity assays. The first stage employed an in silico approach, covering several toxicity endpoints across various (Q)SAR in silico models to identify indicators of toxicity. Bioavailability was categorised by simulating 14-day plasma Cmax predictions for a standard dose level using three TK models (Firman et al. in Arch Toxicol 96:817-830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03205-x , 2022). Bioactivity was categorised using a matrix with potency and severity. In vitro data were obtained from ToxCast. Potency makes use of dose response AC50 values. Severity categorisation is based on consideration of the adverse effects associated with the assays. 12 chemicals have been assessed through the framework. Overall, we have demonstrated that the matrix suggested by the EPAA Designathon can be used to categorise chemicals into three different levels of concern but there are areas still to be explored especially for the range of assays used, the framework categorisation being defined, and how such a matrix would fit into a tiered approach, pragmatically, including targeted in vivo studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Drug Regulation

